Medicalisation of vaping in the UK? E-cigarette users’ perspectives on the merging of commercial and medical routes to vaping

Author:

Ward E1ORCID,Dawkins L2,Holland R3,Pope I4,Notley C4

Affiliation:

1. University of East Anglia, Norwich Research Park, Norwich NR4 7TJ, UK

2. London South Bank University, London, UK

3. University of Leicester, Leicester, UK

4. University of East Anglia, Norwich, UK

Abstract

Background: In the UK, most smokers choosing e-cigarettes to quit smoking will access vaping via commercial routes. In recent years, however, a shift towards medicalisation of vaping has become apparent, with public health guidance supporting e-cigarettes for smoking cessation and increased partnership working between healthcare professionals and the vaping industry. To achieve the UK’s Smokefree 2030 target, the UK Government has set out measures to use e-cigarettes in National Health Service (NHS) settings and to move towards streamlining processes to make e-cigarettes available to a million smokers. This article aims to understand acceptability of different approaches by seeking perspectives of people with lived experience of e-cigarette use for smoking cessation. Methods: Mixed methods data collected between March 2018 and March 2019 as part of a broader study of e-cigarette use trajectories (ECtra study). Data here relate to the views of partnership working and medicalisation of vaping extracted from 136 interviews/extended surveys of people who had used e-cigarettes to try to stop smoking. Qualitative data were thematically analysed. Participant ratings of interventions were presented descriptively, and differences in participant characteristics and ratings were reported. Results: Three qualitative themes were identified: pro-partnership, anti-partnership and medicalisation dissonance. Medicalisation was discussed for its potential to reassure smokers about e-cigarette harms and its potential to reach smokers from disadvantaged backgrounds. Concerns were raised about cost-effectiveness, quality of support, conflicts of interest and limiting product choice. Most participants rated interventions involving partnership working as potentially helpful in switching from smoking to vaping. There were no statistically significant associations between age, gender and socioeconomic status, and helpfulness ratings. Conclusion: Both commercial and medical routes to vaping offer perceived benefits to vapers and may complement and reinforce each other to support smoking cessation.

Funder

Cancer Research UK

Publisher

SAGE Publications

Subject

Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health

Reference47 articles.

1. E-Cigarettes: A Disruptive Technology That Revolutionizes Our Field?

2. Therapeutic Goods Administration. Notice of final decision to amend the current Poisons Standard – nicotine. Available online at: www.tga.gov.au/scheduling-decision-final/notice-final-decision-amend-current-poisons-standard-nicotine (2020, last accessed 24 August 2022).

3. Cochrane database of systematic reviews. Available online at: https://www.cochranelibrary.com/cdsr/about-cdsr

4. Kock L, West R, Beard E, et al. Trends in electronic cigarette use in England. Available online at: www.smokinginengland.info/graphs/e-cigarettes-latest-trends (2022, last accessed 24 August 2022).

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3