Affiliation:
1. University of Haripur, Pakistan
2. Archives and Libraries Department, KPK Pakistan, Pakistan
Abstract
Sectarian activists in Pakistan are occasionally arrested by law enforcement agencies in sectarian-terrorism crimes but very rarely convicted by the courts. Contemporary research mainly relates slow convictions in sectarian crimes to defects in the state's criminal justice system. But this article connects anti-terrorism courts’ (ATCs) slow convictions and large-scale acquittals in sectarian-terrorism crimes to vague anti-terror laws, judges’ and witnesses’ security concerns and the incompetence of the prosecution and judges. The article applies the mixed method of research by using data from personal interviews, online sources, newspapers, research journals, articles and books. It argues that undefined anti-terrorism laws, judges’ security concerns and sectarian activists’ terrorization of judges and eyewitnesses add to the ATCs’ slow convictions in sectarian-terrorism crimes in the Punjab. Moreover, prosecution and judges’ incompetence and their inclination towards Islamic principles in judgements show bias in the application of sectarian-terrorism related laws that have been causing large-scale acquittals in the ATCs.
Subject
Political Science and International Relations,Sociology and Political Science
Reference42 articles.
1. Abbas H (2010) Shiism and sectarian conflict in Pakistan: Identity politics, Iranian influence, and tit-for-tat violence. Combating Terrorism Center (CTC) Occasional Paper. Available at: https://www.ctc.usma.edu/posts/shiism-and-sectarian-conflict-in-pakistan (accessed 15 March 2017).
2. Ahmad T (2015) Legal provisions on fighting extremism: Pakistan. The Law Library of Congress. Available at: https://www.loc.gov/law/help/fighting-extremism/pakistan.php (accessed 3 June 2021).
3. Shari'a, Custom, and Statutory Law: Comparing State Approaches to Islamic Jurisprudence, Tribal Autonomy, and Legal Development in Afghanistan and Pakistan
4. null