Renal abscess in children: Is size an important determinant in deciding treatment options?

Author:

Jain Prashant1ORCID,Prasad Ashish1,Sharma Rachna2,Jain Sarika3

Affiliation:

1. Department of Paediatric Surgery and Paediatric Urology, BLK-MAX Super Speciality Hospital, New Delhi, India

2. Department of Paediatric Intensive care, BLK-MAX Super Speciality Hospital, New Delhi, India

3. Department of Radiodiagnosis, DODA Imaging, New Delhi, India

Abstract

Background: Renal abscess (RA) is rarely seen in the paediatric age group. The proposed management protocols are mainly derived from the adult series which may not be appropriate in children. Objective: In this retrospective analysis of cases with renal and perinephric abscesses, the objective is to correlate the clinical presentation, radiological findings and treatment options and also to propose a paediatric-specific practical management algorithm. Study design: This is a retrospective study of cases with renal and perinephric abscesses admitted between March 2012 and February 2020. The patients were reviewed for demographics, presentation, predisposing factors, laboratory investigations, imaging, management and outcome. Results: Analysis of 12 paediatric patients (13 renal units) with RA (median age 4 years) was done. Organisms were isolated in 8 of 12 (66.6%) patients with Gram-negative organisms being the commonest. On admission, all patients were started on empirical broad-spectrum antibiotics. Except for two patients who were critically ill with frank sepsis and had a tender renal lump, the rest of them were initially offered conservative management with intravenous antibiotics, and the response was reviewed after 48–72 hours. Of five units with abscess size of ⩽3 cm, two units (40%) responded to conservative management, while three units (60%) required intervention, and of eight units of size >3 cm, three units (37.5%) responded to conservative management and five units (62.5%) required intervention. None of the abscesses with perinephric collection (30.7%) responded to antibiotics and required intervention. Conclusion: A protocol based on the size of RA as recommended in most of the adult series may not be appropriate in the paediatric age group because of the differences in clinical presentation, predisposing factors and immune response. The clinical condition on presentation, response to antibiotic therapy and the presence of perinephric collection should be considered as an important determinant in deciding the need for intervention. Level of evidence: 4

Publisher

SAGE Publications

Subject

Urology,Surgery

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3