Short (23-hour)-stay robotic-assisted radical prostatectomy in a state-funded national health service – Is it safe and feasible?

Abstract

Objectives: The COVID-19 pandemic has led to a long waiting list for elective surgery and increasing bed pressures from acute admissions. This led to widespread cancellations on the day of surgery even for cancer procedures. To address this, all inpatient stay robotic-assisted radical prostatectomy (RARP) cases were managed via our day surgery unit as a 23-hour stay. We report the safety and feasibility of our initial implementation. Methods: A standard operating procedure for admission via the day surgery unit, including a modified enhanced recovery pathway, for patients undergoing RARP with or without pelvic lymph node dissection (PLND) was devised. All pre-operative variables were collected, and all perioperative outcomes analysed. Primary outcomes were number of on the day cancellations, discharge failure as 23-hour stay and 30-day readmissions. Results: Between November 2021 and June 2022, 135 patients underwent RARP with or without PLND via the day surgery unit. Mean patient age was 65 (46–76) years. Mean operative time and estimated blood loss were 153 (67–281) minutes and 197 (50–700) mL, respectively. Concomitant lymph node dissection was performed in 32.7% of cases. No patient required blood transfusion or conversion to open. We had 3 (2.2%) discharge failures, all of which were due to clinical reasons. Our 30-day hospital readmission rate was 3.7%, while another 5.2% attended emergency department and were discharged without admission. Conclusion: Short (23-hour)-stay RARP is safe and feasible and reduces pressure on inpatient beds but requires a multidisciplinary approach and engagement from all stakeholders. Level of evidence: 2