High on-treatment platelet reactivity in peripheral arterial disease: A systematic review

Author:

Goncalves Lauren N1,van Velze Veerle1,Klok Frederikus A2,Gal Pim3,Vos Rimke C45,Hamming Jaap F6,van der Bogt Koen E A789ORCID

Affiliation:

1. Haaglanden Medisch Centrum, The Hague, the Netherlands

2. Department of Medicine-Thrombosis and Hemostasis, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, the Netherlands

3. Centre for Human Drug Research, Leiden, the Netherlands

4. Department of Public Health and Primary Care, Leiden University Medical Center Campus the Hague, The Hague, the Netherlands

5. Health Campus The Hague, The Hague, the Netherlands

6. Department of Surgery, Leiden University Medical Center, University Vascular Center Leiden, Leiden, The Hague, the Netherlands

7. Department of Surgery, Haaglanden Medical Center, The Hague, the Netherlands

8. Department of Surgery, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, the Netherlands

9. University Vascular Center Leiden, The Hague, the Netherlands

Abstract

Objectives To highlight current evidence pertaining to the measurement methods and prevalence of high on-treatment platelet reactivity (HTPR) in patients with PAD, as well as to evaluate the relationship between HTPR and recurrent adverse cardiovascular and limb events in PAD patients. Methods A systematic review of English-language literature on HTPR in patients with PAD. An electronic literature search of PubMed and Medline was performed in May 2021. Results A total of 29 studies with a total number of 11,201 patients with PAD were identified. HTPR during clopidogrel treatment ranges from 9.8 to 77%, and during aspirin treatment ranges from 4.1 to 50% of PAD patients. HTPR was associated with adverse clinical outcomes. The need for limb revascularisation was higher in patients with HTPR during clopidogrel use. Similarly, HTPR during aspirin use in the PAD population was predictive of adverse cardiovascular events (HR 3.73; 95% CI, 1.43–9.81; p = .007). A wide range of techniques were applied to measure platelet resistance, without consensus on cut-off values. Furthermore, differing patient populations, a variety of antiplatelet regimens, and differing clinical endpoints highlight the high degree of heterogeneity in the studies included in this review. Conclusion No consensus on technique or cut-off values for HTPR testing has been reached. Patients with HTPR are potentially at a greater risk of adverse limb-related and cardiovascular events than patients sensitive to antiplatelet therapy illustrating the need for clinical implementation of HTPR testing. Future research must aim for consistent methodology. Adaptation of antiplatelet therapy based on HTPR results requires further exploration.

Funder

Research Fund Haaglanden Medical Center

Bronovo Research Fund

Publisher

SAGE Publications

Subject

Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine,Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and imaging,General Medicine,Surgery

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3