Unpacking Assumptions About Inclusion in Community-Based Health Promotion: Perspectives of Women Living in Poverty

Author:

Ponic Pamela1,Frisby Wendy2

Affiliation:

1. University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada,

2. University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada

Abstract

Community-based health promoters often aim to facilitate “inclusion” when working with marginalized women to address their exclusion and related health issues. Yet the notion of inclusion has not been critically interrogated within this field, resulting in the perpetuation of assumptions that oversimplify it. We provide qualitative evidence on inclusion as a health-promotion strategy from the perspectives of women living in poverty. We collected data with women engaged in a 6-year community-based health promotion and feminist participatory action research project. Participants’ experiences illustrated that inclusion was a multidimensional process that involved a dynamic interplay between structural determinants and individual agency. The women named multiple elements of inclusion across psychosocial, relational, organizational, and participatory dimensions. This knowledge interrupts assumptions that inclusion is achievable and desirable for so-called recipients of such initiatives. We thus call for critical consideration of the complexities, limitations, and possibilities of facilitating inclusion as a health-promotion strategy.

Publisher

SAGE Publications

Subject

Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health

Reference72 articles.

1. Patients as Partners in Responsive Research: Methodological Notions for Collaborations in Mixed Research Teams

2. Abrams, D., Hogg, M.A. & Marques, J.M. ( 2005). A social psychological framework for understanding social inclusion and exclusion. In D. Abrams, M. A. Hogg, & J. M. Marques (Eds.), The social psychology of inclusion and exclusion (pp. 1-24). New York: Psychology Press.

3. Anzaldua, G.E. ( 2002). (Un)natural bridges, (un)safe spaces. In G. E. Anzaldua & A. Keating (Eds.), This bridge we call home: Radical visions for transformation (pp. 1-5). New York: Routledge.

4. Brydon-Miller, M. ( 2004). The terrifying truth: Interrogating systems of power and privilege and choosing to act. In M. Brydon-Miller , P. Maguire, & A. McIntyre (Eds.), Travelling companions: Feminism, teaching, and action research (pp. 3-20). Westport, CT: Praeger.

5. Perspective: A New Ethic for Health Promotion: Reflections on a Philosophy of Health Education for the 21st Century

Cited by 33 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3