Comparison of the validity and reliability of local positioning systems against other tracking technologies in team sport: A systematic review

Author:

Pino-Ortega José1,Oliva-Lozano José M2ORCID,Gantois Petrus3ORCID,Nakamura Fábio Yuzo34,Rico-González Markel15ORCID

Affiliation:

1. BioVetMed&SportSci Research Group, University of Murcia, Murcia, Santiago de la Ribera, Spain

2. Health Research Centre, Faculty of Educational Sciences, University of Almería, Almería, Spain

3. Associate Graduate Program in Physical Education UPE/UFPB, João Pessoa, Brazil

4. Research Centre in Sports Sciences, Health Sciences and Human Development, University Institute of Maia, Maia, Portugal

5. Department of Physical Education and Sport, University of the Basque Country, Vitoria-Gasteiz, Spain

Abstract

Given the accuracy in data collection, radar-based local positioning systems (LPS) are a promising technology to monitor training load in team sports. The objective of this study was to systematically review articles that compare the validity and reliability of LPS to other electronic performance and tracking system (EPTS) in team sports. The authors searched three electronic databases (SPORTDiscus, PubMed, and Web of Science) to identify relevant studies published by October 21, 2019. A Boolean search was performed, including sport ( population), search terms related to intervention technology ( intervention technology), and outcome measures of the technology ( outcomes). Seven studies evaluated the validity and reliability of LPS in team sports in comparison with other EPTS, including semi-automatic video technology (VID) and Global Positioning System (GPS). Two articles compared LPS to VID, three articles compared LPS to GPS, and two articles compared LPS to both GPS and VID. LPS is considered a valid and reliable EPTS in the field of load monitoring of team sports, usually resulting in higher accuracy than VID or GPS. However, special care should be taken when analyzing load indicators at high speeds or different trajectories, since the validity and reliability depend on the EPTS itself.

Publisher

SAGE Publications

Subject

General Engineering

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3