Breathing resistance in automated metabolic systems is high in comparison with the Douglas Bag method and previous recommendations

Author:

Ainegren Mats1,Jensen Kurt2,Rosdahl Hans3

Affiliation:

1. Sports Tech Research Centre, Mid Sweden University, Östersund, Sweden

2. Department of Sports Science and Clinical Biomechanics, Muscle Physiology and Biomechanics, The University of Southern Denmark, Odense, Denmark

3. The Swedish School of Sport and Health Sciences, Stockholm, Sweden

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to investigate the resistance to breathing in metabolic systems used for the distribution and measurement of pulmonary gas exchange. A mechanical lung simulator was used to standardize selected air flow rates ([Formula: see text], L/s). The delta pressure (Δ p, Pa) between the ambient air and the air inside the equipment was measured in the breathing valve’s mouthpiece adapter for four metabolic systems and four types of breathing valves. Resistance for the inspiratory and expiratory sides was calculated as RES = (Δ p/[Formula: see text]) Pa/L/s. The results for resistance showed significant ( p < 0.05) between-group variance among the tested metabolic systems, breathing valves, and between most of the completed [Formula: see text]. The lowest resistance among the metabolic systems was found for a Douglas Bag system which had approximately half of the resistance compared to the automated metabolic systems. The automated systems were found to have higher resistance even at low [Formula: see text] in comparison with previous findings and recommendations. For the hardware components, the highest resistance was found for the breathing valves, while the lowest resistance was found for the hoses. The results showed that resistance in metabolic systems can be minimized through conscious choices of system design and hardware components.

Publisher

SAGE Publications

Subject

General Engineering

Reference22 articles.

1. McArdle WD, Katch FI, Katch VL. Exercise Physiology: nutrition, energy, and human performance. 5th ed. Philadelphia, PA: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins, 2001, pp.183, 202, 400–402, 1052, 117–120.

2. Open-circuit respirometry: a brief historical review of the use of Douglas bags and chemical analyzers

3. Validity, reliability and stability of the portable Cortex Metamax 3B gas analysis system

4. Evaluation of the Oxycon Mobile metabolic system against the Douglas bag method

Cited by 6 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

1. Development and validation of dynamic bioenergetic model for intermittent ergometer cycling;European Journal of Applied Physiology;2023-06-27

2. Effects of Aerodynamic Drag and Drafting on Propulsive Force and Oxygen Consumption in Double Poling Cross-Country Skiing;Medicine & Science in Sports & Exercise;2022-02-10

3. A Maximal Rowing Ergometer Protocol to Predict Maximal Oxygen Uptake;International Journal of Sports Physiology and Performance;2021-03-01

4. Breathing resistance in heat and moisture exchanging devices;Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers, Part P: Journal of Sports Engineering and Technology;2020-12-15

5. Breathing resistance in metabolic systems: Its effects on pulmonary ventilation and oxygen uptake in elite athletes with high aerobic power;Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers, Part P: Journal of Sports Engineering and Technology;2020-06-10

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3