How reliable are the tactical measures obtained in soccer small-sided games? A test-retest analysis of observational instruments and GPS-based variables

Author:

Praça Gibson Moreira1ORCID,Abreu Cristóvão de Oliveira1,Rochael Marcelo1,Moreira Pedro Drumond1

Affiliation:

1. Departamento de Esportes, Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais, Belo Horizonte, Brazil

Abstract

This study investigated the test-retest reliability in both within and between-session reliability of commonly adopted tactical measures in small-sided games. GPS-based and observational tactical variables from three instruments were collected from a 4 versus 4 small-sided game played by 16 U-17 elite players. The games were played three times in the same training session (within-session reliability) and repeated after 1 week (between-session reliability). The reliability of the data was analyzed by calculating the Intraclass Correlation Coefficient (ICC) and the Standard Error of Measurement (SEM) for all dependent variables. Results showed good-to-excellent reliability and a low error for GPS-based tactical variables, mainly the width and length positioning (ICC  > 0.9, SEM < 10%, p < 0.05). Observational variables showed poor-to-moderate reliability, except the offensive performance measured by the FUT-SAT in the between-session analysis. It is concluded that GPS-based tactical variables show acceptable reliability and might be used for talent identification and training outputs assessment in soccer. The variability inherent to small-sided games is associated with both the open nature of the task and poor measurement quality. Increasing the quality of the instruments will likely provide a better view of the actual variability of this training tool.

Funder

Coordenação de Aperfeiçoamento de Pessoal de Náível Superior

Fundação de Amparo à Pesquisa do Estado de Minas Gerais

América Futebol Clube

Publisher

SAGE Publications

Subject

General Engineering

Cited by 3 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3