Is There Any Difference in Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation Performance According to Different Instructional Models of Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation Education for Junior and Senior High School Students?

Author:

Kim SE1,Lee SJ1,Noh H1,Lee DH1,Kim CW

Affiliation:

1. Myongji Hospital, Department of Emergency Medicine, Seoul, Korea; Noh Hyun, MD

Abstract

Objective This study aims to determine whether or not cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) skills differ according to different instructional models for CPR education and training for junior and senior high school students. Methods This was a prospective and randomised study including 519 junior and senior high school students. After the lecture on CPR, students practiced the skill on the manikin. Group 1 used model 1 and Group 2 used model 2 for practical training and practical skills and CPR performance quality were evaluated. Results Data from skill tests were analysed in 229 students in group 1 and 210 students in group 2. The total score of sequence skill tests was 17.8±2.0 points. During 2 cycles, no chest elevation was observed in 33.3% and was significantly lower in group 1. There were no significant differences in the frequency of proper ventilation and in ventilation volume between the 2 groups. Excessive ventilation was more frequently observed in group 1 and insufficient ventilation was observed more frequently in group 2. The percentage of the frequency of a proper chest compression rate was 80.5±31.2% and there were no significant differences in proper and insufficient depths, mean rate and recoil of the chest in chest compression between the 2 groups. Conclusions There were differences in CPR skills according to different CPR training manikins. Therefore, certain conditions seem to be considered in selection of instructional models for CPR psychomotor skills. (Hong Kong j.emerg.med. 2011;18:375-382)

Publisher

SAGE Publications

Subject

Emergency Medicine

Cited by 3 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3