Prescribers’ reported acceptance and use of drug-drug interaction alerts: An Australian survey

Author:

Baysari Melissa T1ORCID,Dort Bethany A Van1,Zheng Wu Yi12,Li Ling3,Hilmer Sarah45,Westbrook Johanna3,Day Richard67

Affiliation:

1. Biomedical Informatics and Digital Health, School of Medical Sciences, Faculty of Medicine and Health, Charles Perkins Centre, The University of Sydney, NSW, Australia

2. Black Dog Institute, NSW Australia

3. Centre for Health Systems and Safety Research, Australian Institute of Health Innovation, Macquarie University, Sydney, NSW, Australia

4. Kolling Institute of Medical Research, Faculty of Medicine and Health, The University of Sydney, NSW, Australia

5. Departments of Clinical Pharmacology and Aged Care, Royal North Shore Hospital, Sydney, NSW, Australia

6. Department of Clinical Pharmacology and Toxicology, St Vincent’s Hospital, Sydney, NSW, Australia

7. St Vincent’s Clinical School, Faculty of Medicine, UNSW, Sydney, NSW, Australia

Abstract

Drug-drug interaction (DDI) alerts are frequently included in electronic medical record (eMR) systems to provide users with relevant information and guidance at the point of care. In this study, we aimed to examine views of DDI alerts among prescribers, including junior doctors, registrars and senior doctors, across Australia. A validated survey for assessing prescribers’ reported acceptance and use of DDI alerts was distributed among researcher networks and in newsletters. Fifty useable responses were received, more than half ( n = 28) from senior doctors. Prescribers at all levels expected DDI alerts to improve performance but junior doctors reported that this was at a high cost, with respect to time and effort. Senior doctors and registrars reported rarely reading alerts and rarely changing prescribing decisions based on alerts. Respondents identified a number of problems with current alerts including limited relevance, repetition, and poor design, highlighting some clear areas for alert improvement.

Funder

National Health and Medical Research Council

Publisher

SAGE Publications

Subject

Health Informatics

Cited by 1 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3