Incomplete patient information exchange and unnecessary repeat diagnostics during oncological referrals in the Netherlands: exploring the role of information exchange

Author:

De Swart Merijn E1ORCID,Zonderhuis Barbara M1,Hellingman Tessa1,Kuiper Babette I1,Dickhoff Chris1,Heineman David J1,Hendrickx Jan J2,Kouwenhoven Mathilde CM3,Van Moorselaar R Jeroen A4,Schuur Maaike3,Tenhagen Mark1,Van Der Velde Susanne1,De Witt Hamer Philip C5,Zijlstra Josée M6,Kazemier Geert1

Affiliation:

1. Department of Surgery, Cancer Center Amsterdam, Amsterdam UMC, VU University Medical Center, The Netherlands

2. Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Cancer Center Amsterdam, Amsterdam UMC, VU University Medical Center, The Netherlands

3. Department of Neurology, Cancer Center Amsterdam, Amsterdam UMC, VU University Medical Center, The Netherlands

4. Department of Urology, Cancer Center Amsterdam, Amsterdam UMC, VU University Medical Center, The Netherlands

5. Department of Neurosurgery, Cancer Center Amsterdam, Amsterdam UMC, VU University Medical Center, The Netherlands

6. Department of Hematology, Cancer Center Amsterdam, Amsterdam UMC, VU University Medical Center, The Netherlands

Abstract

Data management in transmural care is complex. Without digital innovations like Health Information Exchange (HIE), patient information is often dispersed and inaccessible across health information systems between hospitals. The extent of information loss and consequences remain unclear. We aimed to quantify patient information availability of referred oncological patients and to assess its impact on unnecessary repeat diagnostics by observing all oncological multidisciplinary team meetings (MDTs) in a tertiary hospital. During 84 multidisciplinary team meetings, 165 patients were included. Complete patient information was provided in 17.6% (29/165, CI = 12.3–24.4) of patients. Diagnostic imaging was shared completely in 52.5% (74/141, CI = 43.9–60.9), imaging reports in 77.5% (100/129, CI = 69.2–84.2), laboratory results in 55.2% (91/165, CI = 47.2–62.8), ancillary test reports in 58.0% (29/50, CI = 43.3–71.5), and pathology reports in 60.0% (57/95, CI = 49.4–69.8). A total of 266 tests were performed additionally, with the main motivation not previously performed followed by inconclusive or insufficient quality of previous tests. Diagnostics were repeated unnecessarily in 15.8% (26/165, CI = 10.7–22.4) of patients. In conclusion, patient information was provided incompletely in majority of referrals discussed in oncological multidisciplinary team meetings and led to unnecessary repeat diagnostics in a small number of patients. Additional research is needed to determine the benefit of Health Information Exchange to improve data transfer in oncological care.

Funder

ZonMw

Publisher

SAGE Publications

Subject

Health Informatics

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3