Affiliation:
1. University of Illinois Department of Psychology Champaign, Illinois
Abstract
In an empirical test of various predictor and quickened display algorithms eighteen professional pilot-subjects made four curved-path landing approaches in a Gat-2 simulator using each of 14 dynamically different display configurations in a within-subject design. Results indicate that second- and third-order predictor displays provide the best lateral performance. Intermediate levels of prediction and quickening provide best vertical control. Predictor-quickening algorithms of increasing computational order signficantly reduce aileron, rudder, and elevator control responses, reflecting successive reductions in cockpit workload. Whereas conventional crosspointer displays are not adequate for curved landing approaches, perspective displays with predictors and some vertical dimension quickening are highly effective.
Cited by
4 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献
1. Defining information needs in neonatal resuscitation with work domain analysis;Journal of Clinical Monitoring and Computing;2020-05-26
2. Moving Horizons, Control Reversals, and Graveyard Spirals;Ergonomics in Design: The Quarterly of Human Factors Applications;2004-10
3. Ergavionics: Designing the Job of Flying an Airplane;The International Journal of Aviation Psychology;2002-10
4. Glideslope Descent-Rate Cuing to Aid Carrier Landings;Human Factors: The Journal of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society;1984-12