A Comparative Evaluation of Ship Complementing Tools

Abstract

Reduced manning offers potential through-life costs savings for naval platforms. If the introduction of lean manned platforms is to be successful, tools are required to demonstrate that proposed future complements can operate platforms effectively. Four tools designed to support the complementing process were reviewed: ERASMUS, CVM-Manning Model; CSEM and CREW. The data requirements of the tools varied according to the procurement stage. Complement generation tools accept less detailed information than validation tools concerning platform equipment fit; operational scenarios and personnel. Such tools do not permit comprehensive real-time simulation of platform operations. Complement validation tools provide real-time simulation facilities but require input data of considerably greater detail. Data of this type are typically difficult to obtain. Data entry and management functions are particularly important attributes of validation tools. Further development work is necessary to meet users' requirements for “usable” tools to support accurate complementing of future naval systems throughout procurement.