Evaluation of Latest Computer Workstation Standards

Author:

Stone Richard1,Vasan Midhun1,Mgaedeh Fatima12,Wang Zhonglun1,Westby Braden1

Affiliation:

1. Iowa State University, Department of Industrial and Manufacturing Systems Engineering, Ames, IA 50011, USA

2. Jordan University of Science and Technology, Department of Industrial Engineering, Irbid 22110, Jordan

Abstract

The study reflects the relevance of existing standards for setting up computer workstations. Normal human behavior doesn't always make us assume the best postures as we tend to shift posture to make ourselves comfortable. Even though we know it's not good for our body, we frequently get caught up in the activity at hand, resulting in inappropriate and awkward postures. A 2x2 factorial design that included two different arrangements of a computer workstation and two different chairs with different features was used to make participants perform a 2-hour computer task during which the postures were measured. There is no significant difference in postural behavior for different workstation arrangements or interaction effects. Two posture variables showed differences across the two chairs used. Arranging workstations based on standards doesn't cause a significant effect on the subjects' postural behavior. Chair features or the design seem to have affected how they assume their postures.

Publisher

SAGE Publications

Subject

General Medicine,General Chemistry

Reference46 articles.

1. Anderson J. (2008, January 14). New standard now available for computer workstation designers. Retrieved October 11, 2016, from Ergonomics Today, https://ergoweb.com/new-standard-now-available-for-computerworkstation-designers/

2. High physical and psychosocial load at work and sickness absence due to neck pain

3. The Spinal Curvature of Three Different Sitting Positions Analysed in an Open MRI Scanner

4. Depth Perception as a Function of Age

Cited by 1 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

1. Law Enforcement Uniforms and Public Perception: An Overview and Pilot Study;Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society Annual Meeting;2023-09

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3