Affiliation:
1. Glendale, California
2. Boster, Kobayashi and Associates, Livermore, California
Abstract
In recent litigation Human Factors Experts have been misapplying the analysis of the looming threshold for offset motions. Looming (or image size expansion) analysis is appropriate for a rapid direct approach to an object (i.e., rear-end collisions) but is inappropriate for offset motions. Typically, looming threshold analysis is applied to nighttime driving when approaching a slow-moving or stopped vehicle presenting no visual cues other than rear tail lights. This paper lays out the foundation for looming, derives the accepted mathematical equation, and compares it to the rate of visual angle change, which is more applicable to offset motions. An appropriate offset looming threshold equation is derived. In addition, a special case of collision due to looming combined with lateral motion is addressed which has historical significance in open water vessel navigation.
Subject
General Medicine,General Chemistry
Reference6 articles.
1. Green M. (2008) Collision analysis. In Green M., Allen M.J., Abrams B.S., Wientraub L. (Eds.), Forensic Vision with Application to Highway Safety—3rd Edition, Tucson, AZ: Lawyers & Judges Publishing Company
2. Looming Threshold Limits and Their Use in Forensic Practice
3. Mortimer R.G. (1990) Perceptual factors in rear-end crashes, Proceeding of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society, 34th Annual Meeting, 591–594, Santa Monica, CA: Human Factors and Ergonomics Society.