Individual Differences in Misremembering Fake News on Social Media

Author:

Barr Hannah M.12,Cotter Jenna E.12,O’Hear Emily H.12,Gray Carly E.12,Chesser Amber F.12,Atchely Andrew12,Tenhundfeld Nathan L.12

Affiliation:

1. University of Alabama in Huntsville

2. Huntsville, Alabama, United States

Abstract

Social media is omnipresent in many lives, and its popularity has made it a prime delivery method for misinformation. This problem is widely recognized, even by social media companies. The debate rages on as to what the right approach should be to combat misinformation; some suggest removal of misinformation; others suggest labeling misinformation. Therefore, it is important to understand how labeling misinformation may interact with individual differences to affect recall of what is and is not misinformation. In addition to factors like confirmation bias, in-group versus out-group assignment, and other cognitive effects, there may be individual differences that could affect the likeliness of misremembering the veracity of information. In this study, the effects of differences in working memory and personality on recall of misinformation labels are tested, with the aim being to determine what, if any, effect these factors have on the utility of misinformation labels. Results indicate no predictive capability for knowing individuals’ working memory, extroversion, and conscientiousness on their recall of whether information was labeled as false.

Publisher

SAGE Publications

Subject

General Medicine,General Chemistry

Reference33 articles.

1. 13 sports facts that even the most hardcore fans don’t know. (2014, February 4). HuffPost. https://www.huffpost.com/entry/sports-factsunknown_n_4704083

2. null

3. 101 Fun Facts You Never Knew, Guaranteed to Totally Blow Your Mind. (2021, December 9). Parade. https://parade.com/966564/parade/fun-facts/

4. Trends in the diffusion of misinformation on social media

5. Investigating the predictive roles of working memory and IQ in academic attainment

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3