Diagnostic Value of Hepcidin in Sepsis: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Abstract

Objectives: To investigate the diagnostic value of hepcidin for sepsis diagnosis. Methods: The relevant literature on hepcidin for sepsis diagnosis published up to October 20, 2023, was systematically searched in the Web of Science, PubMed, Embase, and China Knowledge Network databases. Two researchers screened the literature and extracted relevant data according to the inclusion and exclusion criteria. Study quality was evaluated using the Quality Assessment of Diagnostic Accuracy Studies 2 tool. Meta-analysis and calculation of sensitivity, specificity, positive likelihood ratio, negative likelihood ratio, and diagnostic odds ratio were performed using State16 and Review Manager 5.3 software. Furthermore, receiver operating characteristic curve (ROC) was plotted, and the respective area under the curve (AUC) was calculated to assess the accuracy of hepcidin. Publication bias was evaluated using Deeks’ funnel plot asymmetry test. Results: Overall, 1047 patients from 8 studies were included (625 patients with sepsis and 422 controls). The quality of the literature was relatively moderate. Meta-analysis demonstrated the presence of heterogeneity in the data ( I2  > 50%, P < .05), and a randomized model was employed to combine the diagnostic indicators. Regarding its accuracy for sepsis diagnosis, hepcidin demonstrated a pooled sensitivity of 0.88 (95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.76-0.94) and specificity of 0.91 (95% CI: 0.76-0.97). The diagnostic odds ratio was 69.00 (95% CI: 19.00-253.00), and the ROC curve revealed an AUC of 0.95. Additionally, Deeks’ funnel plot asymmetry test demonstrated absence of publication bias. Conclusions: Our meta-analysis suggested that hepcidin has a high diagnostic value in sepsis and may be a valuable diagnostic tool.