Review of a Large Clinical Series: Focused Bedside Echocardiography in the Surgical Intensive Care Unit: Comparison of 3 Methods to Estimate Cardiac Index

Author:

Gunst Mark1,Matsushima Kazuhide2,Sperry Jason3,Ghaemmaghami Vafa4,Robinson Melissa5,O'Keeffe Terence6,Friese Randall7,Frankel Heidi8

Affiliation:

1. Wilford Hall Medical Center, San Antonio, USA

2. Penn State Milton S. Hershey Medical Center, Pennsylvania, USA

3. University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Pittsburgh, USA

4. Banner Good Samaritan Medical Center, Arizona, USA

5. Department of Cardiology, University of California Davis Medical Center, Sacramento, USA

6. University Medical Center, Arizona, USA

7. University of Arizona, USA

8. Department of Surgery, Division of Burn / Trauma / Critical Care, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, USA,

Abstract

We sought to determine which of 3 methods used to evaluate cardiac index (CI) is the most accurate using focused bedside echocardiography (ECHO). We hypothesized that the fractional shortening (FS) method would provide a more accurate estimate of CI than the left ventricular outflow tract/velocity-time integral (LVOT/VTI) or Simpson’s methods. This was a prospective observational cohort study conducted in the surgical ICU of an urban level 1 trauma center utilizing all patients with a pulmonary artery catheter (PAC) in place. Three surgical intensive care unit (SICU) faculty and 3 fellows underwent focused cardiac ultrasound training. Focused ECHO exams—bedside echocardiographic assessment in trauma/critical care (BEAT)— were performed using the Sonosite portable ultrasound device (Bothall, Washington). Stroke volume (SV) measurements were prospectively obtained on all trauma/SICU patients, with a PAC in place, using FS, LVOT/VTI, and Simpson’s methods. The investigators were blinded to the PAC data. From each measurement, CI was calculated and categorized as low, normal, or high, based on a normal range of 2.4 to 4.0 L/min per m2. Each CI obtained from the PAC was similarly categorized. The association between the BEAT and PAC estimates of CI was evaluated for each method using chi-square goodness of fit. Eighty five BEAT exams were performed on consecutive SICU patients, 56% were on trauma and 44% on emergency general surgery patients. There was a statistically significant association between the CI estimate using the FS method (P = .012), but not the LVOT/VTI (P = .33) or Simpson’s method (P = .74). Our data showed a significant association between the PAC estimate of CI and our estimate using the FS method. The other methods were difficult to obtain, subjective, and inaccurate. Fractional shortening was the method of choice to estimate CI for the BEAT exam performed by intensivists in SICU patients.

Publisher

SAGE Publications

Subject

Critical Care and Intensive Care Medicine

Cited by 18 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

1. Endpoints of resuscitation;Current Therapy of Trauma and Surgical Critical Care;2024

2. Critical care ultrasound in geriatric trauma resuscitation leads to decreased fluid administration and ventilator days;Journal of Trauma and Acute Care Surgery;2021-07-14

3. Echo is a good, not perfect, measure of cardiac output in critically ill surgical patients;Journal of Trauma and Acute Care Surgery;2019-04-26

4. Focused Cardiac Ultrasound in the CT ICU: Helpful or Just Another Toy?;Difficult Decisions in Surgery: An Evidence-Based Approach;2019

5. Endpoints of Resuscitation;Surgical Critical Care Therapy;2018

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3