Performance of a 25% Inferior Vena Cava Collapsibility in Detecting Fluid Responsiveness When Assessed by Novice Versus Expert Physician Sonologists

Author:

Corl Keith A.1ORCID,Azab Nader1,Nayeemuddin Mohammed1,Schick Alexandra2,Lopardo Thomas3,Zeba Fatima4,Phillips Gary5,Baird Grayson6,Merchant Roland C.78,Levy Mitchell M.1,Blaivas Michael9,Abbasi Adeel17

Affiliation:

1. Department of Medicine, Alert Medical School of Brown University, Providence, RI, USA

2. Department of Emergency Medicine, Alpert Medical School of Brown University, Providence, RI, USA

3. Alpert Medical School of Brown University, the Brown University School of Public Health, Providence, RI, USA

4. Department of Medicine, Kent Hospital, Alpert Medical School of Brown University, Warwick, RI, USA

5. Center for Biostatistics, Department of Biomedical Informatics, Ohio State University, Columbus, Ohio, USA

6. Lifespan Biostatistics Core, Rhode Island Hospital, Providence, RI, USA

7. Brown University School of Public Health, Providence, RI, USA

8. Department of Emergency Medicine, Brigham and Women’s Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA

9. Department of Emergency Medicine, St Francis Hospital, University of South Carolina School of Medicine, Columbus, SC, USA.

Abstract

Objectives: Inferior vena cava collapsibility (cIVC) measured by point-of-care ultrasound (POCUS) has been proposed as a noninvasive means of assessing fluid responsiveness. We aimed to prospectively evaluate the performance of a 25% cIVC cutoff value to detect fluid responsiveness among spontaneously breathing intensive care unit (ICU) patients when assessed with POCUS by novice versus expert physician sonologists. Methods: Prospective observational study of spontaneously breathing ICU patients. Fluid responsiveness was defined as a >10% increase in cardiac index following a 500 mL fluid bolus, measured by bioreactance. Novice sonologist measured cIVC with POCUS. Their measurements were later compared to an expert physician sonologist who independently reviewed the POCUS images and assessed cIVCs. Results: Of the 85 participants, 44 (52%) were fluid responders. A 25% cIVC cutoff value performed better when assessed by expert sonologists than novice physician sonologists (receiver–operator characteristic curve, ROC = 0.82 [0.74-0.88] vs ROC = 0.69 [0.60-0.77]). Conclusions: A 25% cIVC cutoff value measured by POCUS detects fluid responsiveness. However, the experience of the physician sonologist affects test performance and should be considered when interpreting and clinically using cIVC to direct intravenous fluid resuscitation.

Publisher

SAGE Publications

Subject

Critical Care and Intensive Care Medicine

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3