Continuous Electroencephalographic Monitoring in the Intensive Care Unit: A Cross-Sectional Study

Author:

Koffman Lauren1ORCID,Rincon Fred2,Gomes Joao3,Singh Sarabdeep4,He Yitian5,Ritzl Eva6,Bleck Thomas P.1,Kaplan Peter W.7,Nyquist Paul8

Affiliation:

1. Department of Neurological Sciences, Rush University Medical Center, Chicago, IL, USA

2. Cerebrovascular Disease and Neurocritical Care, Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, PA, USA

3. Cerebrovascular Center, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH, USA

4. Department of Core Clinical Research and Biostatistics, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA

5. University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, WI, USA

6. Department of Neurology and Epilepsy, The Johns Hopkins Hospital, Baltimore, MD, USA

7. Department of Neurology and Epilepsy, Johns Hopkins Bayview Medical Center, Baltimore, MD, USA

8. Department of Anesthesiology and Critical Care Medicine, The Johns Hopkins Hospital, Baltimore, MD, USA

Abstract

Objective: Research on continuous electro-encephalographic monitoring (cEEG) in the intensive care unit (ICU) has previously focused on neuroscience ICUs. This study determines cEEG utilization within a sample of specialty ICUs world-wide. Methods: A cross-sectional electronic survey of attending level physicians across various intensive care settings. Twenty-five questions developed from consensus statements on the use of cEEG in the critically ill sent as an electronic survey. Results: Of all, 9344 were queried and 417 (4.5%) responses were analyzed with 309 (74%) from the United States and 74 (18%) internationally. Intensive care units were: medical (10%), surgical (6%), neurologic/neurosurgical (12%), cardiac (4%), trauma (3%), pediatrics (29%), burn (<1%), multidisciplinary (30%), and other (5%). Intensive care units were: academic (65%), community (18%), public (3%), military (1%), and other (13%). Specialized cEEG teams were available in 71% of ICUs. Rapid 24/7 access and cEEG interpretation was available in 32% of ICUs. Interpretation changed clinical management frequently (28%) and sometimes (45%). Conclusions: Despite guideline recommendations for cEEG use, there is a discordance between availability, night coverage, and immediate interpretation. Only 27% have institutional protocols for indications and duration of cEEG monitoring. Furthermore, cEEG may be underutilized in nonneurologic ICUs as well as ICUs in smaller nonacademic affiliated hospitals and those outside of the United States.

Publisher

SAGE Publications

Subject

Critical Care and Intensive Care Medicine

Cited by 8 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3