Affiliation:
1. From the Department of Pediatrics, Loyola University Stritch School of Medicine, Maywood, IL
Abstract
Clinical judgment and its sources of error are inves tigated by studying the clinician's use of mental strate gies, heuristics, and biases. I review these findings, which have been obtained by analyzing medical judg ment in nonintensive care settings, with emphasis on appropriate applications for the intensivist. Particularly important in the intensive care unit (ICU) setting are sources of judgmental error introduced by using hy pothesis-driven reasoning and by attempting to intu itively mimic probabilistic reasoning. Such mental short- cuts are intended to aid the clinician, but are potential hindrances if misused. During ICU decision making, cer tain tendencies toward error are accentuated and must be recognized and guarded against. Conversely the in tensivist's valid judgments can best be defended if the context and constraints of ICU decision making are well understood. I analyze those tendencies and contexts shown to be important to intensive care and review opportunities to improve both the practice and under standing of clinical judgment in this setting.
Subject
Critical Care and Intensive Care Medicine
Reference49 articles.
1. Medical Thinking
2. The scientific study of clinical judgment in psychology and medicine
3. Psychological Approaches to Medical Decision Making
4. Elstein AS, Bordage G. Psychology of clinical reasoning. In: Stone GC, Cohen F, Adler NE, eds. Health psychology. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass, 1979:337-367
Cited by
7 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献