Abstract
Prostatic specific antigen (PSA) screening has been controversial since its inception. Controversy has persisted despite more and higher quality clinical evidence. Attention to lead and length time biases, overdiagnosis, overtreatment, medicalisation, iatrogenesis and financial conflict of interest has had limited impact. I undertook a social history of the prostate cancer diagnosis to reassess the causes of controversy and suggest different clinical and policy responses. For much of the twentieth century, clinicians were uninterested in early detection and radical treatment, believing that cancers revealed after obstruction-relieving surgery or autopsy could be ignored. In 1985, the FDA approved PSA diagnostic tests, which rapidly catalysed two self-reinforcing cycles of action and perception. One occurred when the increased diagnoses made the disease more prevalent and feared, and efforts at prevention and treatment seem more efficacious, leading to more screening, and so on. The other cycle occurred among men with screening detected cancer who initially eschewed radical treatments or imagined doing so, whose lives were often consumed with fear and surveillance, increasing demand for radical cures. This history underscores the need for novel clinical and policy responses to the looping effects—self-reinforcing cycles of action and perception—which can radically transform so much of what we believe and do about disease.