The Giant That Never Woke

Author:

Paparozzi Mario A.1,Guy Roger1

Affiliation:

1. University of North Carolina at Pembroke

Abstract

This article argues that discretionary parole is the lynchpin to improved correctional practice. Calls to abolish discretionary parole have failed to consider its potential to steer correctional agendas toward sustainable evidence-based practices (EBPs) and effective reentry/transitional services. The history of corrections and parole is marked by tension between the goals of warehousing and correcting prisoners. Notwithstanding a growing body of impressive research that clarifies the importance of the implementation of EBPs to recidivism reduction, their ubiquitous implementation has been impeded by structural flaws within correctional organizations. Moreover, corrections practitioners and scholars have not addressed issues related to the professional competency of discretionary parole authorities as well as their potential to serve as a protective organizational factor that promotes offender rehabilitation and reintegration.

Publisher

SAGE Publications

Subject

Law

Reference96 articles.

1. DOES CORRECTIONAL TREATMENT WORK? A CLINICALLY RELEVANT AND PSYCHOLOGICALLY INFORMED META-ANALYSIS *

2. Association of State Correctional Administrators. ( 2000). Correctional best practices: Directors’ perspectives . Retrieved June 8, 2009, from http://www.asca.net/documents/bestprac_000.pdf

Cited by 9 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

1. The Psychology of Parole Decision-Making;The Cambridge Handbook of Psychology and Legal Decision-Making;2024-02-29

2. Paroling Authorities and the Challenge of Leverage in an Era of Chronic Mass Incarceration;Handbook of Issues in Criminal Justice Reform in the United States;2021-12-05

3. Actor–observer asymmetry in perceptions of parole board release decisions;Psychiatry, Psychology and Law;2020-12-07

4. Examining the policies of paroling authorities in the United States to support evidence-based practices;European Journal of Probation;2020-12

5. Parole, Neighborhood and Reentry Outcomes: A Contextualized Analysis;International Journal of Offender Therapy and Comparative Criminology;2020-07-31

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3