Safety of different electrocautery modes for endoscopic sphincterotomy: a Bayesian network meta-analysis

Author:

Hedjoudje Abdellah1ORCID,Cheurfa Chérifa2,Farha Jad3,Jaïs Bénédicte4,Aubert Alain4,Lorenzo Diane4,Maire Frédérique4,Badurdeen Dilhana3,Kumbhari Vivek3,Prat Frédéric4

Affiliation:

1. Service d’endoscopie digestive, DMU Digestif, Hôpital Beaujon, Assistance Publique des Hôpitaux de Paris, 100 boulevard du Général Leclerc, 92110 Clichy, France. Division of Gastroenterology, Johns Hopkins Medical Institutions, Baltimore, MD, USA

2. Université de Paris, Epidemiology and Statistics, Sorbonne Paris Cité Research Center, (CRESS-UMR1153), INSERM, Cochrane France, Paris, France

3. Division of Gastroenterology, Johns Hopkins Medical Institutions, Baltimore, MD, USA

4. Service d’endoscopie digestive, DMU Digestif, Hôpital Beaujon, Assistance Publique des Hôpitaux de Paris, Clichy, France

Abstract

Background and aims: Post-endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography acute pancreatitis (PAP) and post-sphincterotomy hemorrhage are known adverse events of post-endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography. Various electrosurgical currents can be used for endoscopic sphincterotomy. The extent to which this influences adverse events remains unclear. We assessed the comparative safety of different electrosurgical currents, through a Bayesian network meta-analysis of published studies merging direct and indirect comparison of trials. Methods: We performed a Bayesian random-effects network meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials that compared the safety of different electrocautery modes for endoscopic sphincterotomy. Results: Nine studies comparing four electrocautery modes (blended cut, pure cut, endocut, and pure cut followed by blended cut) with a combined enrollment of 1615 patients were included. The pooled results of the network meta-analysis did not show a significant difference in preventing post-sphincterotomy pancreatitis when comparing electrocautery modes. However, pure cut was associated with a statistically significant increased risk of bleeding compared with endocut [relative risk = 4.30; 95% confidence interval (1.53–12.87)]. On the other hand, the pooled results of the network meta-analysis showed no significant difference in prevention of bleeding when comparing blended cut versus endocut, pure cut followed by blended cut versus endocut, pure cut followed by blended cut versus blended cut, pure cut versus blended cut, and pure cut versus pure cut followed by blended cut. The results of rank probability found that endocut was most likely to be ranked the best. Conclusion: No electrocautery mode was superior to another with regard to preventing PAP. Endocut was superior with respect to preventing bleeding. Therefore, we suggest performing endoscopic sphincterotomy with endocut.

Publisher

SAGE Publications

Subject

Gastroenterology

Cited by 3 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

1. Electrosurgery in Gastrointestinal Endoscopy: Bench to Bedside;Journal of Digestive Endoscopy;2024-05-31

2. Electrosurgical unit in GI endoscopy: the proper settings for practice;Expert Review of Gastroenterology & Hepatology;2023-08-03

3. Prevention of post-ERCP pancreatitis: current strategies and novel perspectives;Therapeutic Advances in Gastroenterology;2023-01

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3