Treatment of Lateral Epicondylitis With Platelet-Rich Plasma, Glucocorticoid, or Saline

Author:

Krogh Thøger Persson1,Fredberg Ulrich1,Stengaard-Pedersen Kristian2,Christensen Robin34,Jensen Pia1,Ellingsen Torkell1

Affiliation:

1. Diagnostic Centre, Region Hospital Silkeborg, Silkeborg, Denmark

2. Department of Rheumatology, Aarhus University Hospital, Aarhus, Denmark

3. Musculoskeletal Statistics Unit, Parker Institute, Department of Rheumatology, Copenhagen University Hospital, Frederiksberg, Denmark

4. Institute of Sports Science and Clinical Biomechanics, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Southern Denmark, Odense, Denmark

Abstract

Background: Lateral epicondylitis (LE) is a common musculoskeletal disorder for which an effective treatment strategy remains unknown. Purpose: To examine whether a single injection of platelet-rich plasma (PRP) is more effective than placebo (saline) or glucocorticoid in reducing pain in adults with LE after 3 months. Study Design: Randomized controlled trial; Level of evidence, 1. Methods: A total of 60 patients with chronic LE were randomized (1:1:1) to receive either a blinded injection of PRP, saline, or glucocorticoid. The primary end point was a change in pain using the Patient-Rated Tennis Elbow Evaluation (PRTEE) questionnaire at 3 months. Secondary outcomes were ultrasonographic changes in tendon thickness and color Doppler activity. Results: Pain reduction at 3 months (primary end point) was observed in all 3 groups, with no statistically significant difference between the groups; mean differences were the following: glucocorticoid versus saline: −3.8 (95% CI, −9.9 to 2.4); PRP versus saline: −2.7 (95% CI, −8.8 to 3.5); and glucocorticoid versus PRP: −1.1 (95% CI, −7.2 to 5.0). At 1 month, however, glucocorticoid reduced pain more effectively than did both saline and PRP; mean differences were the following: glucocorticoid versus saline: −8.1 (95% CI, −14.3 to −1.9); and glucocorticoid versus PRP: −9.3 (95% CI, −15.4 to −3.2). Among the secondary outcomes, at 3 months, glucocorticoid was more effective than PRP and saline in reducing color Doppler activity and tendon thickness. For color Doppler activity, mean differences were the following: glucocorticoid versus PRP: −2.6 (95% CI, −3.1 to −2.2); and glucocorticoid versus saline: −2.0 (95% CI, −2.5 to −1.6). For tendon thickness, mean differences were the following: glucocorticoid versus PRP: −0.5 (95% CI, −0.8 to −0.2); and glucocorticoid versus saline: −0.8 (95% CI, −1.2 to −0.5). Conclusion: Neither injection of PRP nor glucocorticoid was superior to saline with regard to pain reduction in LE at the primary end point at 3 months. However, injection of glucocorticoid had a short-term pain-reducing effect at 1 month in contrast to the other therapies. Injection of glucocorticoid in LE reduces both color Doppler activity and tendon thickness compared with PRP and saline.

Publisher

SAGE Publications

Subject

Physical Therapy, Sports Therapy and Rehabilitation,Orthopedics and Sports Medicine

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3