Instrumented evaluation of knee laxity: A comparison of five arthrometers

Abstract

We performed a prospective study on 50 subjects with normal knees and 50 patients with chronic unilateral disruption of the anterior cruciate ligament. In a random ized testing sequence, both groups were examined with five arthrometers: the MEDmetric KT-1000, the Stryker Knee Laxity Tester, the Acufex Knee Signature System, the Dyonics Dynamic Cruciate Tester, and the Genucom Knee Analysis System. Each examination was performed according to protocol with the knee at 30° of flexion. The total anterior laxity measurements of the normal subjects using the Dyonics Dynamic Cruciate Tester and Acufex Knee Signature System were approxi mately half of the KT-1000, Stryker, and Genucom values. A comparison of the side-to-side measurements revealed no statistically significant difference in the values of the five arthrometers. However, the Genucom showed an unacceptably high number of normal sub jects with laxity values that suggested an anterior cru ciate ligament tear. Total anterior laxity measurements of the anterior cruciate ligament deficient knees were almost twice those of normal knees with each device except the Genucom. Comparison of the mean side-to-side differ ence in the patients with ACL deficiency demonstrated statistically significant differences in the values re corded with the five arthrometers. The side-to-side difference was greatest with the KT-1000 and least for the KSS. In the 89 N Lachman test, the KT-1000 and Stryker demonstrated the highest diagnostic accuracy. The maximumm manual test improved the accuracy of each device.