Immobilization in External Rotation and Abduction Versus Arthroscopic Stabilization After First-Time Anterior Shoulder Dislocation: A Multicenter Randomized Controlled Trial

Author:

Minkus Marvin1,Königshausen Matthias2,Maier Dirk3,Mauch Frieder4,Stein Thomas56,Greiner Stefan7,Moursy Mohamed89,Scheibel Markus110

Affiliation:

1. Department for Shoulder and Elbow Surgery, Center for Musculoskeletal Surgery, Charité Universitaetsmedizin Berlin, Berlin, Germany

2. Department of Trauma Surgery and Orthopaedics, Ruhr-University Hospital Bergmannsheil Bochum, Bochum, Germany

3. Department of Orthopedics and Trauma Surgery, Faculty of Medicine, University of Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany

4. Department of Shoulder and Elbow Surgery, Sportklinik Stuttgart, Stuttgart, Germany

5. Department of Sport Traumatology, Knee and Shoulder Surgery, Berufsgenossenschaftliche Unfallklinik, Frankfurt am Main, Germany

6. Department of Sports Medicine, Goethe University Frankfurt, Frankfurt am Main, Germany

7. Sporthopaedicum Regensburg, Regensburg, Germany

8. Orthopedics & Trauma Centre, Medical Faculty of Mannheim, University of Heidelberg, Mannheim, Germany

9. Department of Orthopedics and Traumatology, Paracelsus Medical University, Salzburg, Austria

10. Department of Shoulder and Elbow Surgery, Schulthess Clinic Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland

Abstract

Background: Treatment of first-time shoulder dislocation (FSD) is a topic of debate. After high rates of recurrent instability after nonoperative management were reported in the literature, primary repair of FSD significantly increased. At the same time, new concepts were proposed that had promising results for immobilization in external rotation (ER) and abduction (ABD). Purpose: The aim of this study was to evaluate the recurrence rates (primary outcome) and clinical outcomes (secondary outcome parameters) of immobilization in ER+ABD versus arthroscopic primary stabilization after FSD. Study Design: Randomized controlled trial; Level of evidence, 1. Methods: In a multicenter randomized controlled trial, patients with FSD were randomized to either treatment with immobilization in 60° of ER plus 30° of ABD (group 1) or surgical treatment with arthroscopic Bankart repair (group 2). Clinical evaluation was performed 1, 3, and 6 weeks as well as 6, 12, and 24 months postoperatively or after reduction, including range of motion, instability testing, subjective shoulder value, Constant-Murley score, Rowe score, and Western Ontario Shoulder Instability Index. Recurrent instability events were prospectively recorded. Results: Between 2011 and 2017, a total of 112 patients were included in this study. Of these, 60 patients were allocated to group 1 and 52 to group 2. At the 24-month follow-up, 91 patients (81.3%) were available for clinical examination. The recurrence rate was 19.1% in group 1 and 2.3% in group 2 ( P = .016). No significant differences were found between groups regarding clinical shoulder scores ( P > .05). Due to noncompliance with the immobilization treatment protocol, 4 patients (6.7%) were excluded. Conclusion: Immobilization in ER+ABD versus primary arthroscopic shoulder stabilization for the treatment of FSD showed no differences in clinical shoulder scores. However, recurrent instability was significantly higher after nonoperative treatment.

Funder

Wilhelm Julius Teufel Company

Publisher

SAGE Publications

Subject

Physical Therapy, Sports Therapy and Rehabilitation,Orthopedics and Sports Medicine

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3