Differences in Physician and Patient Ratings of Items Used to Assess Hip Disorders

Author:

Martin RobRoy L.1,Mohtadi Nicholas G.2,Safran Marc R.3,Leunig Michael4,Martin Hal D.5,McCarthy Joseph6,Guanche Carlos A.7,Kelly Bryan T.8,Byrd J. W. Thomas9,Clohisy John C.10,Philippon Marc J.11,Sekiya Jon K.12

Affiliation:

1. Duquesne University, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania

2. University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta, Canada

3. Stanford University, Stanford, California

4. Schulthess Clinic, Zürich, Switzerland

5. Oklahoma Sports Science and Orthopaedics, Oklahoma City, Oklahoma

6. Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts

7. Southern California Orthopedic Institute, Van Nuys, California

8. Hospital for Special Surgery, New York, New York

9. Nashville Sports Medicine Foundation, Nashville, Tennessee

10. Washington University, St. Louis, Missouri

11. Steadman-Hawkins Research Foundation, Vail, Colorado

12. MedSport-Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan

Abstract

Background The purpose of this study was to determine what issues are important to active individuals with hip lesions and to assess whether these issues are different from those that surgeons think are important. Hypothesis A discrepancy will be noted between what patients and surgeons believe to be important. Study Design Cross-sectional study; Level of evidence, 3. Methods This study comprised 150 consecutive patients (73 men, 77 women) from the international practices of 9 orthopaedic surgeons specializing in the management of hip disorders. All participants were seeking treatment for musculoskeletal hip disease. Average patient age was 42 ± 11 years (range, 18-60). Patients and surgeons rated the importance of 146 potential hip outcome assessment items on a 6-point Likert-type scale. Results Of the 23 items identified as being important to patients, 16 were in the sports and recreation category. The top 11 items that the clinicians thought were most important were rated significantly lower by patients (P <. 0005). Specifically, surgeons rated several items as being important that fell into the symptoms, functional limitations, and occupational issues categories, whereas patients did not. That is, a difference was found between patients and clinicians in how they rated items related to symptoms, functional limitations, and occupation (P <. 01). A difference was not found between patients and surgeons in how they rated items related to sports and recreation and social-emotional lifestyle (P >. 01). Conclusion The hypothesis of this study was affirmed: a discrepancy was found between what issues patients believe are important and what surgeons perceive as being important to patients. This information may be particularly important when assessing treatment outcomes from a patient's perspective. Clinicians must be careful in presuming that the issues that they are attempting to improve with treatment are issues that are important to patients. These findings also emphasize the importance of discussing appropriate postoperative expectations for those considering surgery.

Publisher

SAGE Publications

Subject

Physical Therapy, Sports Therapy and Rehabilitation,Orthopedics and Sports Medicine

Cited by 54 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3