Affiliation:
1. Southwestern Orthopaedic Medical Group, Inc, and National Athletic Health Institute, Inglewood, California
Abstract
With the likely hypothesis that the degree to which a football player is physically suited to his position will determine his value as a player, we attempted to de scribe the characteristics of a given player and position and, from that, to determine the characteristics that make up a first class player in that position. Over a 4-year period 167 football players were ex amined at the National Athletic Health Institute, Ingle wood, California, and grouped according to playing position and class. Position groups were: 1, linemen; 2, linebackers and tight ends; 3, running backs, quar terbacks and kickers; and 4, wide receivers and defen sive backs. Classes were: I, rookies (nonstarters); II, veterans (nonstarters); and III, starters (veterans and an occasional rookie). Testing was in two phases, body characteristics and direct measurement of body function. All testing was done in connection with the preseason physical exam. Significant differences were found when data were analyzed by position. Position 1 players were taller, heavier, and had a higher percentage of body fat than players at other positions. These values decreased from Position 1 to Position 4. In terms of cardiovascular fitness the opposite trend was seen. Strength meas ures were also specific to given position groups. While few differences were seen when data were analyzed by class, one interesting finding was that Class III players (starters) were not only the oldest, but also had the highest level of cardiovascular fitness. Our conclusion is that while size, strength, and en durance are obvious advantages for the successful regular player, there is an unmeasurable quality re flected in the playing ability of the veteran player that is not easily identified in the beginning player.
Subject
Physical Therapy, Sports Therapy and Rehabilitation,Orthopedics and Sports Medicine
Reference8 articles.
1. Costill DL The relationship between selected physiological variables and distance running performance J Sports Med 7 61-66, 1967
2. Costill DL, Branam G., Eddy D., et al: Determinates of marathon running success Int Z Angew Physiol 29 249-254, 1971
3. Novak LP, Hyatt RE, Alexander JF Body composition and physiological function of athletes JAMA 205 764-770, 1969
4. A modified somatotype method
5. Riendeau RP, Wlech BE, Cnsp CE, et al: Relationship of body fat to motor fitness test scores Res Q Am Assoc Health Phys Educ Recreat 29. 200-203, 1958
Cited by
17 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献