The Arthroscopic Surgical Skill Evaluation Tool (ASSET)

Author:

Koehler Ryan J.1,Amsdell Simon2,Arendt Elizabeth A.3,Bisson Leslie J.4,Bramen Jonathan P.3,Butler Aaron1,Cosgarea Andrew J.5,Harner Christopher D.6,Garrett William E.7,Olson Tyson1,Warme Winston J.8,Nicandri Gregg T.2

Affiliation:

1. School of Medicine, University of Rochester, Rochester, New York

2. Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, University of Rochester, Rochester, New York

3. Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, Minnesota

4. Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, University of Buffalo, Buffalo, New York

5. Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, Maryland

6. Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania

7. Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Duke University, Durham, North Carolina

8. Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington

Abstract

Background: Surgeries employing arthroscopic techniques are among the most commonly performed in orthopaedic clinical practice; however, valid and reliable methods of assessing the arthroscopic skill of orthopaedic surgeons are lacking. Hypothesis: The Arthroscopic Surgery Skill Evaluation Tool (ASSET) will demonstrate content validity, concurrent criterion-oriented validity, and reliability when used to assess the technical ability of surgeons performing diagnostic knee arthroscopic surgery on cadaveric specimens. Study Design: Cross-sectional study; Level of evidence, 3. Methods: Content validity was determined by a group of 7 experts using the Delphi method. Intra-articular performance of a right and left diagnostic knee arthroscopic procedure was recorded for 28 residents and 2 sports medicine fellowship–trained attending surgeons. Surgeon performance was assessed by 2 blinded raters using the ASSET. Concurrent criterion-oriented validity, interrater reliability, and test-retest reliability were evaluated. Results: Content validity: The content development group identified 8 arthroscopic skill domains to evaluate using the ASSET. Concurrent criterion-oriented validity: Significant differences in the total ASSET score ( P < .05) between novice, intermediate, and advanced experience groups were identified. Interrater reliability: The ASSET scores assigned by each rater were strongly correlated ( r = 0.91, P < .01), and the intraclass correlation coefficient between raters for the total ASSET score was 0.90. Test-retest reliability: There was a significant correlation between ASSET scores for both procedures attempted by each surgeon ( r = 0.79, P < .01). Conclusion: The ASSET appears to be a useful, valid, and reliable method for assessing surgeon performance of diagnostic knee arthroscopic surgery in cadaveric specimens. Studies are ongoing to determine its generalizability to other procedures as well as to the live operating room and other simulated environments.

Publisher

SAGE Publications

Subject

Physical Therapy, Sports Therapy and Rehabilitation,Orthopedics and Sports Medicine

Cited by 101 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3