Closed versus open partial meniscectomy: Postoperative changes in the force-velocity relationship of muscle

Author:

Prietto Carlos A.1,Caiozzo Vincent J.1,Prietto Pablo P.1,Mcmaster William C.1

Affiliation:

1. Human Performance Lab, University of California, Irvine, California

Abstract

This study compares the effects of closed and open partial meniscectomies on the in vivo force-velocity relationship of the knee extensors. One group of normal subjects (controls, N = 7) and two groups of patients (closed partial meniscectomy, N = 9; open partial men iscectomy, N = 6) participated in this study. Each volunteer was tested on three occasions (presurgery, 20 days postsurgery, and 42 days postsurgery) for maximal knee extension torque at 0, 48, 96, 144, and 192°/sec using an isokinetic dynamometer. Maximal knee extension torques were recorded at a specific joint angle (30° below the horizontal plane) for all test speeds. Presurgically, the injured leg exhibited a uni form impairment of approximately -20%. At 20 days postsurgery, a substantial difference was evident be tween the two groups of patients. For the closed group, the mean (±SE) impairment was -19.5 ± 2.2, -23.9 ± 2.8, -31.5 ± 4.0, -37.5 ± 5.3, and - 34.5 ± 6.1% at 0, 48, 96, 144, and 192°/sec, respectively. In contrast, the corresponding impairment for the open group was -34.9 ± 7.2, -47.7 ± 4.8, -57.5 ± 5.3, -57.0 ± 3.5, and -59.1 ± 3.2%. The impairment of both groups was speed-specific with the greatest deficits occurring at 192°/sec. At 42 days postsurgery, there were no sig nificant differences between the two groups of patients although the open group still demonstrated speed- specific impairment. These results demonstrate that the closed approach has less effect on functional pa rameters which are important to athletic competition.

Publisher

SAGE Publications

Subject

Physical Therapy, Sports Therapy and Rehabilitation,Orthopedics and Sports Medicine

Cited by 16 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3