A comparison between the transpatellar tendon and the lateral approach to the knee joint during arthroscopy

Author:

Eriksson Ejnar1,Sebik Ahmet1

Affiliation:

1. Section of Trauma, Department of Surgery, Karolinska Sjukhuset, Stockholm, Sweden

Abstract

The cental transpatellar tendon arthroscopic approach and the standard lateral approach were compared in 200 unselected cadaver knees. A 5-mm arthroscopic dummy was used in the investigation. In 198 knees, using the transpatellar tendon approach, the dummy passed through the infrapatellar fat pad. In 7 cases with the transpatellar approach and in 22 cases with the lateral approach, we were unable to reach the medial posterior compartment of the knee joint. It was usually easier to insert the arthroscopic dummy into the posterior fossa if the knee joint was held at 35 to 40° of flexion of the knee than at 90° of flexion. In 88 of 100 knees, the dummy could be passed from the transpatellar approach into the lateral posterior fossa and in 77 of 100 knees from the lateral approach. Patella baja was found in 16 knees (8%). Since the transpatellar tendon approach should not be used in these cases, it means that this technique cannot be used in all cases. From an anatomical point of view, the transpatellar tendon method thus does not offer any major advantages compared to the standard lateral one.

Publisher

SAGE Publications

Subject

Physical Therapy, Sports Therapy and Rehabilitation,Orthopedics and Sports Medicine

Reference3 articles.

1. Jackson RW, Abe J. The role of arthroscopy m the management of disorders of the knee J Bone Joint Surg 54B: 310-322, 1972

2. Gillquist J. , Hagberg G.: A new modification of the technique of arthroscopy of the knee joint Acta Chir Scand 142: 123-130, 1976

3. Dolk T., Arthroscopy of the knee joint experiences after 2 years. Opusc Med 22: 99-102, 1977 (in Swedish)

Cited by 20 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3