Osteochondral Allograft Reaming Significantly Affects Chondrocyte Viability

Abstract

Background: Chondrocyte viability is associated with the clinical success of osteochondral allograft (OCA) transplantation. Purpose: To investigate the effect of distal femoral OCA plug harvest and recipient site preparation on regional cell viability using traditional handheld saline irrigation versus saline submersion. Study Design: Controlled laboratory study. Methods: For each of 13 femoral hemicondyles, 4 cartilage samples were harvested: (1) 5-mm control cartilage, (2) 15-mm OCA donor plug harvested with a powered coring reamer and concurrent handheld saline irrigation (“traditional”), (3) 15-mm OCA donor plug harvested while submerged under normal saline (“submerged”), and (4) 5-mm cartilage from the peripheral rim of a recipient socket created with a 15-mm cannulated counterbore reamer to a total depth of 7 mm with concurrent handheld saline irrigation (“recipient”). The 15 mm–diameter plugs were divided into the central 5 mm and the peripheral 5 mm (2 edges) for comparisons. Samples were stained using calcein and ethidium, and live/dead cell percentages were calculated and compared across groups. Results: Compared with the submerged group, the traditional group had significantly lower percentages of live cells across the whole plug (71.54% ± 4.82% vs 61.42% ± 4.98%, respectively; P = .003), at the center of the plug (72.76% ± 5.87% vs 62.30% ± 6.11%, respectively; P = .005), and at the periphery of the plug (70.93% ± 4.51% vs 60.91% ± 4.75%, respectively; P = .003). The traditional group had significantly fewer live cells in all plug regions compared with the control group (77.51% ± 9.23%; P < .0001). There were no significant differences in cell viability between the control and submerged groups (whole: P = .590; center: P = .713; periphery: P = .799). There were no differences between the central and peripheral 5-mm plug regions for the traditional (62.30% ± 6.11% vs 60.91% ± 4.75%, respectively; P = .108) and submerged (72.76% ± 5.87% vs 70.93% ± 4.51%, respectively; P = .061) groups. The recipient group (61.10% ± 5.02%) had significantly lower cell viability compared with the control group ( P < .0001) and the periphery of the submerged group ( P = .009) but was equivalent to the periphery of the traditional group ( P = .990). Conclusion: There was a significant amount of chondrocyte death induced by OCA donor plug harvesting using a powered coring reamer with traditional handheld saline irrigation, which was mitigated by harvesting the plug while the allograft was submerged under saline. Clinical Relevance: Mitigating this thermally induced damage by harvesting the OCA plug while the allograft was submerged in saline maintained chondrocyte viability throughout the plug and may help to improve the integration and survival of OCAs.