Abstract
Regenerative medicine (“RM”) is a 21st century technology whose regulation has badly needed a 21st century cure. It is not clear that the 21st Century Cures Act (“Cures Act”) is that cure, but it has not been a poison. For some months prior to the passage of the Cures Act it seemed that it might be a catalyst for really endangering the field by allowing a flood of untested therapies to continue to enter the market. That, fortunately, did not happen. Thus far, the Cures Act has been a useful tonic; its effect on RM has been largely symbolic. But it has allowed the Food and Drug Administration (“FDA”) to redirect resources, and it demanded the quick adoption of guidance. That has allowed the Agency to finalize a regulatory framework that has been sorely needed. The evidentiary flexibility within the Cures Act is extremely important for the development of technologies that do not fit easily into the traditional approval rubric.
Publisher
Cambridge University Press (CUP)
Subject
Law,General Medicine,Health (social science)
Reference13 articles.
1. New “21st Century Cures” Legislation
2. Trends in Utilization of FDA Expedited Drug Development and Approval Programs, 1987-2014: Cohort Study;Kesselheim;BMJ (h4633),2015
3. Human Tissues and Reproductive Cloning: New Technologies Challenge FDA;Merrill;House J. Health L. and Pol'y,2002
4. The Strange Allure of State “Right-to-Try” Laws
5. Should patients in need be given access to experimental drugs?
Cited by
2 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献