Abstract
For another thing, the division of medical opinion about the matter at most means uncertainty, a factor that signals the presence of risk, not its absence. That division here involves highly qualified knowledgeable experts on both sides of the issue.—Stenberg v. Carhart, 20001While we find no reliable data to measure the phenomenon, it seems unexceptionable to conclude some women come to regret their choice to abort the infant life they once created and sustained.—Gonzales v. Carhart, 20072
Publisher
Cambridge University Press (CUP)
Subject
Law,General Medicine,Health(social science)
Reference22 articles.
1. Abortion, Race, and Gender in Nineteenth-Century America;Beisel;Am. Soc. Rev.,2004
2. Situated Knowledges: The Science Question in Feminism and the Privilege of Partial Perspective;Haraway;Feminist Stud.,1988
3. Religion, Politics, and Abortion;Perry;U. Det. Mercy L. Rev.,2001
4. The Vulnerable Subject: Anchoring Equality in the Human Condition;Fineman;Yale J.L. and Feminism,2008
5. Resolution 31: Reaffirmation of AMA Official Policy on Abortion;Steen;Proc. Am. Med. Ass'n H.D.,1970
Cited by
10 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献，注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献，订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献