Author:
Reiss Dorit Rubinstein,Karako-Eyal Nili
Abstract
Informed consent matters — so does protecting people from infectious diseases. This paper examines what the appropriate informed consent process for vaccines should look like and how the process is conceptualized by law and health authorities. Drawing on the extensive theoretical and empirical literature on informed consent and vaccination, this article sets out what an ideal informed consent process for vaccination would consist of, highlighting the need for autonomous decisions. To be autonomous, decisions need to be based on full, accessible information and reached without coercion. We suggest that the information provided must address the nature of the procedure — including benefits to the child, benefits to society, and risks. Parents should have their concerns and misconceptions addressed. The information needs to be accessible and include an opportunity to ask questions. Based on this ideal model we examined in detail the legal framework surrounding informed consent to vaccination and the process as conceptualized by health authorities in two countries, Israel and the United States, to assess whether they meet the requirements. These two countries are similar in some of their values, for example, the importance of individual autonomy, and face similar problems related to vaccine hesitancy. At the same time, there are meaningful differences in their vaccine policies and the current structures of their informed consent processes, allowing for a meaningful comparison. We found neither country met our ideal informed consent process, and suggested improvements both to the materials and to the processes used to obtain informed consent.
Publisher
Cambridge University Press (CUP)
Subject
Law,General Medicine,Health(social science)
Reference91 articles.
1. America's Changing Color Lines: Immigration, Race/Ethnicity, and Multiracial Identification;Jennifer;Ann. Rev. Soc,2004
2. Individual Freedoms Versus Collective Responsibility: Immunization Decision-Making in the Face of Occasionally Competing Values;Daniel;Emerging Themes Epidemiology,2006
3. General Practitioners' Challenges During the 2009/A/H1N1 Vaccination Campaigns in Australia, Israel and England: A Qualitative Study;Marina;Australian Fam. Physician,2013
4. “Please, Don't Shot My Daughter!” Is There Legal Support for State-Compelled HPV Vaccination Laws? Why Ethical, Moral, and Religious Opposition to These Laws May Be Jumping the Gun;Lindsey;Kan. L. Rev,2008
5. Public Health vs. Patient Rights: Reconciling Informed Consent with HPV Vaccination;Margaret;Emory L.J,2009
Cited by
13 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献