Abstract
AbstractThe social movement surrounding autism in the U.S. has been rightly defined a ray of light in the history of social progress. The movement is inspired by a true understanding of neuro-diversity and is capable of bringing about desirable change in political discourse. At several points along the way, however, the legal reforms prompted by the autism movement have been grafted onto preexisting patterns of inequality in the allocation of welfare, education, and medical services. In a context most recently complicated by economic recession, autism-driven change bears the mark of political and legal fragmentation. Distributively, it yields ambivalent results that have not yet received systemic attention. This article aims to fill this analytical vacuum by offering, first, a synoptic view of the several legal transformations brought about or advocated for by the autism movement and, second, a framework for investigating their distributive consequences.
Publisher
Cambridge University Press (CUP)
Subject
Law,General Medicine,Health(social science)
Reference96 articles.
1. Utilization of a Medicaid-Funded Intervention for Children With Autism
2. Falling Into Full Inclusion: Placing Socialization Over Individualized Education;Wong;U.C. Davis J. Juv. L. and Pol’y,2001
3. Comparative Policy Entrepreneurship: The Case of Autism Related Policy in North America;Baker;J. Comp. Pol’y Analysis,2009
4. Medicare, Medicaid, and People With Disability;Master;Health Care Financing Rev.,1996
5. Muddy Waters: The Supreme Court and the Clear Statement Rule for Spending Clause Legislation;Seligmann;Tul. L. Rev.,2010
Cited by
20 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献