Abstract
This Article analogizes early semiconductor technology and its surrounding economics with isolated genes, stem cells, and related bioproducts, and their surrounding economics, to make the case for sui generis (of its own class) intellectual property protection for isolated bioproducts. Just as early semiconductors failed to meet the patent social bargain requiring novelty and non-obviousness in the 1980s, isolated genes and stem cells currently fail to meet the patent bargain requirements of non-obviousness and eligible subject matter that entitle them to traditional intellectual property protection. Like early semiconductor chip designs, nevertheless, the high cost of upstream bioproduct research and development, coupled with the need to sustain continued economic growth of the biotechnology industry, mandates that Congress provide some level of exclusive rights to ensure continued funding for this research. Sui generis intellectual property protection for isolated bioproducts would preserve the incentive to continue innovation in the field. As illustrated by the semiconductor industry, however, such sui generis protection for this technology must include limitations that address the need to provide an appropriate level of public access to facilitate downstream product development and enrich the public domain.
Publisher
Cambridge University Press (CUP)
Subject
Law,General Medicine,Health (social science)
Reference61 articles.
1. Can Patents Deter Innovation? The Anticommons in Biomedical Research;Heller;Sci.,1998
2. The Patentability of Business Methods, Mathematical Algorithms and Computer-Related Inventions After the Decision by the Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit in State Street;Swanson;Fed. Circuit B.J.,2009
3. The Realities of Our Times: The Semiconductor Chip Protection Act of 1984 and the Evolution of the Semiconductor Industry;Rauch;Fordham Intell. Prop. Media and Ent. L.J.,1993
4. The global stem cell patent landscape: implications for efficient technology transfer and commercial development
5. The Semiconductor Chip Protection Act of 1984: A Swamp or Firm Ground?;Kastenmeier;Minn. L. Rev.,1985
Cited by
2 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献