Assessing Public Perceptions of Virtual Primary Care During the COVID-19 Pandemic in the UK, Germany, Sweden, and Italy: A Topic Modeling Approach

Author:

Machleid Felix123ORCID,Crespo Roberto Fernandez3,Flott Kelsey3,Ghafur Saira3,Darzi Ara34,Mayer Erik34ORCID,Neves Ana Luisa35ORCID

Affiliation:

1. Department of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, Charite’ Campus Mitte, Charite’– Universitatsmedizin Berlin, Corporate Member of Freie Universitat Berlin, Humboldt-Universitat zu Berlin, and Berlin Institute of Health, Berlin, Germany

2. Berlin Institute of Health at Charité– Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Berlin, Germany

3. Institute of Global Health Innovation, Imperial College London, London, UK

4. Department of Surgery & Cancer, Imperial College London, London, UK

5. Department of Primary Care and Public Health, Imperial College London, London, UK

Abstract

The COVID-19 pandemic has driven the transition from face-to-face visits to virtual care delivery. In this study, we explore patients’ perceptions of the benefits and challenges of using virtual primary care technologies during the pandemic, using machine learning approaches. A cross-sectional survey was conducted in August 2020 in Italy, Sweden, Germany, and the UK. Latent Dirichlet Allocation was used to identify themes of two open-ended questions. Comparisons between participant characteristics were made using Wilcoxon rank-sum test. 6,331 participants were included (51.7% female; 42.4% +55 years; 60.5% white ethnicity; 86.6% low literacy). The benefits extracted included: primary care delivery, infection control, reducing contacts, virtual care, timeliness, patient-doctor interaction, convenience, and safety. Participants from Sweden were most likely to mention “primary care delivery” (UK p = .007, IT p = .03, DE p < .001), from the UK “virtual care” (SE p < .001, IT p < .001, DE p < .001) and from Italy “patient-doctor interaction” (UK p < .001, SE p < .001, DE p < .001). The challenges included: diagnostic difficulties, physical examination, digital health risks, technical challenges, virtual care, data security and protection, and lack of personal contact. “Diagnostic difficulties” was most significantly mentioned in Sweden (UK p = .009, IT p < .001, DE p < .001), “virtual care” in the UK (IT p = .02, SE p = .001, DE p < .001), and “data security and protection” in Germany (UK p < .001, IT p = .019, SE p < .001). Our study reinforces the feasibility of using machine learning to explore large qualitative datasets. Our findings contribute to a better identification of the lessons learned during the pandemic and inform improvements in policy and practice.

Publisher

SAGE Publications

Reference64 articles.

1. A topic model of clinical reports

2. On Finding the Natural Number of Topics with Latent Dirichlet Allocation: Some Observations

3. Alternatives to the face-to-face consultation in general practice: focused ethnographic case study

4. The Empirical Foundations of Telemedicine Interventions in Primary Care

5. Bertelsmann Stiftung. (2019). Summary #SmartHealthSystems – Focus Europe. Retrieved November 10, 2021, from https://www.bertelsmann-stiftung.de/en/publications/publication/did/summary-smarthealthsystems-focus-europe

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3