Tension in Interpretations of the Social Impact of the Social Sciences: Walking a Tightrope Between Divergent Conceptualizations of Research Utilization

Author:

Lauronen Juha-Pekka1ORCID

Affiliation:

1. University of Helsinki, Finland

Abstract

In Finland, the discussion surrounding the impact of research on society has continued for two decades without a consensus on how impact should be part of research evaluation. In this paper, I examine the conceptions of social impact in the field of social sciences from the perspectives of policy authors and academics by reviewing policy documents and conducting semi-structured interviews with 14 policy advisors, evaluation experts, and faculty professors. The policy data sets are from 2003 to 2018, the period in which the Finnish discussion on research impact has been the most active. Interpretivist notions on the social impact of the social sciences argue that representations of social impact derive from juxtapositional conceptions of how social science knowledge is part of society. Grounded theory techniques were used to analyze policy artifacts and stakeholder interviews. I identified five interpretative frames. These are impact governance, operationalization of impact, politicization of research utilization, guiding arrangements, and social impact of the social sciences. A key finding is that policy advisors and academic experts tend to integrate divergent vocabularies of research utilization and its evaluation, resulting in uncertainty about the conceptualization and operationalization of impact. Integrity of research utilization in research policy and research evaluation could increase the social capacity of the social sciences by helping to understand the conceptual contribution of these fields to public policies and public discussion.

Funder

koneen säätiö

helsingin yliopisto

Publisher

SAGE Publications

Subject

General Social Sciences,General Arts and Humanities

Reference63 articles.

1. Academy of Finland (AF). (2003). Suomen tieteen tila ja taso: Katsaus tutkimustoimintaan ja tutkimuksen vaikutuksiin 2000-luvun alussa [The state and quality of scientific research in Finland: Overview to research activity and impacts in the early 2000’s]. Reports of the Academy of Finland. https://www.aka.fi/globalassets/awanhat/documents/tiedostot/julkaisut/9_03-suomen-tieteen-tila-ja-taso.pdf

2. Academy of Finland (AF). (2016). Tieteen tila 2016 [The State of Science 2016]. https://www.aka.fi/globalassets/2-suomen-akatemian-toiminta/2-tietoaineistot/aka_tieteen_tila_yksi.pdf

3. Academy of Finland (AF). (2018). Tieteen tila 2018 [The State of Science 2018]. Reports of the Academy of Finland. https://www.aka.fi/globalassets/2-suomen-akatemian-toiminta/2-tietoaineistot/aka_tieteen_tila_2018_web.pdf

4. Academy of Finland (AF), the Committee of Arts and Social Research. (2006). Sivistystä ei voi luoda: Tutkijapuheenvuoroja kulttuurin ja yhteiskunnan tutkimuksen vaikuttavuudesta [Civilization cannot be created: Researchers’ speeches on the impact of arts and social research]. Publications 5/06. https://www.aka.fi/globalassets/awanhat/documents/tiedostot/julkaisut/5_06-sivistysta-ei-voi-tuoda.pdf

5. Attride-Stirling J. (2001). Thematic networks: An analytic tool for qualitative research. Qualitative Research, 1(3), 385–405. https://doi.org/10.1177/146879410100100307

Cited by 2 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3