Experiences of Graduate Students of the First Cohort on Cost-Sharing Policies in Saudi Public Universities: Lessons Learned and Recommendations for Policy and Practice

Author:

Alshamy Alsaeed12ORCID,Barry Abdourahmane3ORCID

Affiliation:

1. Sultan Qaboos University, Muscat, Sultanate of Oman

2. Alexandria University, Alexandria, Egypt

3. Taibah University, Medina, Saudi Arabia

Abstract

The study aimed at investigating the experiences of graduate students who experience, for the first-time, cost-sharing policies in Saudi public universities. The study used the explanatory sequential mixed methods approach, involving a two-phase data collection. First, quantitative data were collected through a questionnaire administered to graduate students of education from 24 out of the 29 public universities, where 384 participants responded. Then, qualitative data were collected through semi-structured interviews conducted with 28 participants who voluntarily signed up for a follow-up interview. The main findings show that 66.4% of participants support the introduction of cost-sharing in public universities. However, there are no student financial aid mechanisms to guarantee equal opportunity for all candidates. Even though 90.4% of participants pay their due shares on time, students who faced financial hardships were not allowed to register for classes until they paid. Further, except for the contract signed during the admission process, there was no informative and accessible cost-sharing policy document to help potential candidates make the right decision before joining a program. Moreover, the cost-sharing programs are not flexible for working students. Participants’ perceptions on cost-sharing and financial aid mechanisms do not differ based on gender and education level but do strongly significantly differ based on cost-sharing policy support. Based on these findings, the researchers suggest five recommendations for policy and practice for the cost-sharing policy to be effective and equitable for all potential candidates.

Publisher

SAGE Publications

Reference49 articles.

1. Alshamy A. (2012). Funding mechanisms and quality assurance systems in higher education in Egypt in comparative perspective (Publication No. 3331). [Doctoral dissertation, University of Birmingham]. https://etheses.bham.ac.uk/id/eprint/3331/

2. Barr N. (2005). Financing higher education: Reforms in Britain may provide a useful framework for other counties. Finance and Development, 42(2), 264–271. https://www.imf.org/external/pubs/ft/fandd/2005/06/barr.htm

3. Blondal S., Field S., Girouard N. (2002). Investment in human capital through upper-secondary and tertiary education. OECD Economic Studies. http://www.oecd.org/dataoecd/0/52/2640202.pdf

4. Using thematic analysis in psychology

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3