Barriers and facilitators to the implementation of individual placement and support (IPS) for patients with offending histories in the community: The United Kingdom experience

Author:

Khalifa Najat12ORCID,Hadfield Sarah3,Thomson Louise4,Talbot Emily5,Bird Yvonne2,Schneider Justine6,Attfield Julie7,Völlm Birgit8,Bates Peter3,Walker Dawn-Marie9

Affiliation:

1. Department of Psychiatry, Queen’s University, Kingston, ON, Canada

2. Nottinghamshire Healthcare NHS Foundation Trust, Wells Road Centre, Nottingham, UK

3. Institute of Mental Health, Nottingham, UK

4. Division of Psychiatry and Applied Psychology, School of Medicine, University of Nottingham, UK

5. DOCS contracted partner of Amgen, Amgen Ltd, Cambridge, UK

6. Faculty of Social Sciences, University of Nottingham, UK

7. Nottinghamshire Healthcare NHS Foundation Trust, Duncan Macmillan House, Nottingham, UK

8. Department of Forensic Psychiatry, University of Rostock, Germany

9. Health Sciences, University of Southampton, UK

Abstract

Introduction We aimed to identify the barriers and facilitators to the implementation of a high fidelity individual placement and support service in a community forensic mental health setting. Method In-depth interviews were conducted with clinical staff ( n = 11), patients ( n = 3), and employers ( n = 5) to examine barriers and facilitators to implementation of a high fidelity individual placement and support service. Data was analysed using thematic analysis, and themes were mapped onto individual placement and support fidelity criteria. Results Barriers cited included competing interests between employment support and psychological therapies, perceptions of patients’ readiness for work, and concerns about the impact of returning to work on welfare benefits. Facilitators of implementation included clear communication of the benefits of individual placement and support, inter-disciplinary collaboration, and positive attitudes towards the support offered by the individual placement and support programme among stakeholders. Offences, rather than mental health history, were seen as a key issue from employers’ perspectives. Employers regarded disclosure of offending or mental health history as important to developing trust and to gauging their own capacity to offer support. Conclusions Implementation of individual placement and support in a community mental health forensic setting is complex and requires robust planning. Future studies should address the barriers identified, and adaptations to the individual placement and support model are needed to address difficulties encountered in forensic settings.

Funder

NIHR Research for Patient Benefit

Publisher

SAGE Publications

Subject

Occupational Therapy

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3