Sleep positioning systems for children and adults with a neurodisability: A systematic review

Author:

Humphreys Ginny1ORCID,King Tanya2,Jex Jo3,Rogers Morwenna4,Blake Sharon5,Thompson-Coon Jo6,Morris Christopher7

Affiliation:

1. Clinical Consultant, Vranch House, Exeter, UK

2. Director of Client Services, Dame Hannah Rogers Trust, Ivybridge, UK

3. Physiotherapist, Active Design Ltd., Birmingham, UK

4. Information Specialist, National Institute for Health Research (NIHR) CLAHRC South West Peninsula (PenCLAHRC), University of Exeter Medical School, Exeter, UK

5. Associate Research Fellow in Child Health, Peninsula Cerebra Research Unit for Childhood Disability (PenCRU), University of Exeter Medical School, Exeter, UK

6. Associate Professor in Evidence Synthesis, NIHR CLAHRC South West Peninsula (PenCLAHRC), University of Exeter Medical School, Exeter, UK

7. Senior Research Fellow in Child Health, Peninsula Cerebra Research Unit for Childhood Disability (PenCRU), University of Exeter Medical School, Exeter, UK

Abstract

Introduction Sleep positioning systems are often prescribed as part of a 24-hour postural management programme for children and adults with neurodisabilities. In a search for evidence of effectiveness for children with cerebral palsy a recent Cochrane review found two randomised controlled trials. This review aims to appraise a broader set of studies including any neurological diagnosis and users of all ages to inform therapists about the quality of the evidence underlying practice. Method A comprehensive search for all peer-reviewed studies that evaluated the use of sleep positioning systems was conducted in MEDLINE, EMBASE, CINAHL, Cochrane Library databases, BNI, HMIC, PEDro, OTSeeker and clinical trials registries. Disability organisations, manufacturers and colleagues worldwide were also contacted. Titles were screened for relevance by two reviewers. Data were extracted into bespoke quantitative or qualitative forms by one reviewer and checked by a second. Findings were analysed into simple themes. Results A total of 14 studies were eligible for inclusion; all were small and most were of low quality. Inferences of benefits cannot be made from the literature but also no harm was found. Conclusions The body of evidence supporting practice remains small and mostly of low quality. Therapists should remain cautious when presenting the benefits to families.

Funder

Posture and Mobility Group

Publisher

SAGE Publications

Subject

Occupational Therapy

Cited by 10 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3