Affiliation:
1. Eulji University College of Medicine, Seoul, South Korea
2. Department of Surgery, Chung-Ang University, Seoul, South Korea
3. Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Chung-Ang University, Seoul, South Korea
Abstract
Whether early postoperative feeding (EPF) after total hip arthroplasty (THA) interferes with recovery of gastrointestinal motility is unclear. This randomized controlled trial compared the feasibility and patient tolerance to either EPF (at 4 hr postoperatively) or late postoperative feeding (LPF; ⩾8 hr postoperatively). One hundred forty patients were randomized to EPF (70 hips) or LPF (70 hips). Patient characteristics, surgical technique, intraoperative characteristics, and postoperative managements were similar between two groups. No significant differences were evident between the groups for vomiting ( p = .231), nausea ( p = .711), regain of appetite ( p = .711), amount of diet ( p = .630), type of food ( p = .429), abdominal pain ( p = 1.000), time to passage of flatus ( p = .231), time to defecations ( p = .619), development of postoperative ileus ( p = 1.000), and length of hospital stay ( p = .643). EPF and LPF show no difference in nausea, return of bowel function, and length of hospital stay without increasing postoperative morbidity. EPF can begin about 4 hr later after elective THA.
Cited by
5 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献