Validity and Reliability of the Korean Version of the Revised Self-Care of Heart Failure Index v7.2-Reference-Cited by-同舟云学术

Validity and Reliability of the Korean Version of the Revised Self-Care of Heart Failure Index v7.2

Published:2022-06-21 Issue:7 Volume:31 Page:1296-1307
ISSN:1054-7738
Container-title:Clinical Nursing Research
language:en
Short-container-title:Clin Nurs Res

Author:

Kim JinShil¹,Kim Kye Hun²,Lim Young-Hyo³,Heo Seongkum⁴,Moon Keumyi⁵,Oh Mi Sook⁵,An Minjeong²^ORCID

Affiliation:

1. Gachon University, Incheon, South Korea

2. Chonnam National University, Gwangju, South Korea

3. Hanyang University, Seoul, South Korea

4. Mercer University, Atlanta, GA, USA

5. Chonnam National University Hospital, Gwangju, South Korea

Abstract

The psychometric properties of the Korean version of the revised Self-Care of Heart Failure Index (SCHFI) remain undetermined; therefore, we aimed to evaluate the construct and convergent validity and reliability of the Korean version of the SCHFI in Korean patients with heart failure (HF). Using a cross-sectional design, 207 patients with HF provided data on self-care and self-efficacy in self-care for this psychometric testing. The confirmatory factor analysis supported the construct validity of the Korean version with a three-factor structure: Self-Care Maintenance, Symptom Perception, and Self-Care Management. Convergent validity was supported by the significant relationships between self-efficacy and each scale of the Korean version of the SCHFI ( r = .425–.549, p < .001). The reliability estimates were marginally adequate, with a Cronbach’s alpha of .655 to .776, McDonald’s omega of .710 to .836, and composite reliability coefficients of .704 to .834. The SCHFI was supported as a valid and reliable measure of self-care for Koreans with HF. However, the marginal levels of the Cronbach’s alpha coefficients still require validation in a larger sample.

Funder

National Research Foundation of Korea

Publisher

SAGE Publications

Subject

General Nursing

Link

http://journals.sagepub.com/doi/pdf/10.1177/10547738221106590

Reference41 articles.

1. Alpert C. M., Smith M. A., Hummel S. L., Hummel E. K. (2017). Symptom burden in heart failure: Assessment, impact on outcomes, and management. Heart Failure Reviews, 22(1), 25–39. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10741-016-9581-4

2. Barbaranelli C., Lee C. S., Vellone E., Riegel B. (2015). The problem with Cronbach’s alpha: Comment on Sijtsma and van der Ark (2015). Nursing Research, 64(2), 140. https://doi.org/10.1097/NNR.0000000000000079

3. Ben Gal T., Kato N. P., Yaari V., Avraham B., Klompstra L., Stromberg A., Jaarsma T. (2020). Psychometric testing of the Hebrew version of the European Heart Failure Self-Care Behaviour Scale. Heart, Lung and Circulation, 29(7), e121–e130. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.hlc.2019.10.019

4. Practical Issues in Structural Modeling

5. Buck H. G., Dickson V. V., Fida R., Riegel B., D’Agostino F., Alvaro R., Vellone E. (2015). Predictors of hospitalization and quality of life in heart failure: A model of comorbidity, self-efficacy and self-care. International Journal of Nursing Studies, 52(11), 1714–1722. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijnurstu.2015.06.018

Cited by 2 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献订阅此论文施引文献，注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献，订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

1. Physical Symptoms, Depressive Symptoms, and Quality of Life in Patients With Heart Failure;Journal of Cardiovascular Nursing;2023-09-29

2. Psychometric properties of the Japanese version of the Self-Care of Heart Failure Index version 7.2;European Journal of Cardiovascular Nursing;2023-07-20