Comparative Analysis of Health Domains for Neuropathic Pain Patients-Reference-Cited by-同舟云学术

Comparative Analysis of Health Domains for Neuropathic Pain Patients

Published:2021-07-22 Issue:1 Volume:31 Page:89-99
ISSN:1054-7738
Container-title:Clinical Nursing Research
language:en
Short-container-title:Clin Nurs Res

Author:

Bader Christine¹^ORCID,Flynn Diane²,Buckenmaier Chester³⁴,McDonald Catherine¹^ORCID,Meghani Salimah¹,Calilung Christian⁴,Polomano Rosemary¹^ORCID

Affiliation:

1. University of Pennsylvania School of Nursing, Philadelphia, USA

2. Madigan Army Medical Center, Tacoma, WA, USA

3. Uniformed Services University of the Health Sciences, Bethesda, MD, USA

4. Defense and Veterans Center for Integrative Pain Management, Rockville, MD, USA

Abstract

Active duty military members have significant service-related risks for developing pain from injury. Although estimates for neuropathic pain (NP) are available for civilian populations, the incidence and prevalence for NP in military members is less clear. Understanding correlates of pain in military members is vital to improving their physical, mental, and social health. Using a comparative design, a secondary analysis was conducted on longitudinal PASTOR data from 190 pain management center patients. The objectives were to compare trends in patient-reported outcomes over time between those screening positive and negative for NP (NP+, NP−, respectively) based on PROMIS Neuropathic Pain Scale T-scores. Findings showed improvements in fatigue, sleep-related impairment, and anger over time. There was a difference between those screening NP+ and NP− for sleep-related impairment, and the cross-level interaction effect showed sleep-related impairment worsening over time. These results emphasize the need to identify NP and implement and evaluate targeted therapies.

Funder

robert wood johnson foundation

Publisher

SAGE Publications

Subject

General Nursing

Link

http://journals.sagepub.com/doi/pdf/10.1177/10547738211030640

Reference52 articles.

1. Aguinis H., Gottfredson R., Culpepper S. (2013). Best-practice recommendations for estimating cross-level interaction effects using multilevel modeling. Journal of Management, 39(6), 1490–1528. https://doi.org/10.1177/0149206313478188

2. Askew R. L., Cook K. F., Keefe F. J., Nowinski C. J., Cella D., Revicki D. A., Morgan DeWitt E. M., Michaud K., Trence D. L., Amtmann D. (2016). A PROMIS measure of neuropathic pain quality. Value in Health, 19(5), 623–630. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jval.2016.02.009

3. Askew R. L., Cook K. F., Revicki D. A., Cella D., Amtmann D. (2016). Evidence from diverse clinical populations supported clinical validity of PROMIS pain interference and pain behavior. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology, 73, 103–111. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclinepi.2015.08.035

4. Belgrade M. J. (1999). Following the clues to neuropathic pain. Postgraduate Medicine, 106(6), 127–140. https://doi.org/10.3810/pgm.1999.11.770

5. Brauer M., Curtin J. (2018). Linear mixed_effects models and the analysis of nonindependent data: A unified framework to analyze categorical and continuous independent variables that vary within-subjects and/or within-items. Psychological Methods, 23, 389–411. https://doi.org/10.1037/met0000159