Social engineering and the disclosure of personal identifiable information: Examining the relationship and moderating factors using a population-based survey experiment

Author:

van der Kleij Rick1ORCID,van ‘t Hoff—De Goede Susanne2,van de Weijer Steve3ORCID,Leukfeldt Rutger4

Affiliation:

1. Centre of Expertise Cyber Security, The Hague University of Applied Sciences (THUAS), The Hague, the Netherlands; Department of Networked Organisations, Netherlands Organisation for Applied Scientific Research (TNO), The Hague, the Netherlands

2. Centre of Expertise Cyber Security, The Hague University of Applied Sciences (THUAS), The Hague, the Netherlands

3. Netherlands Institute for the Study of Crime and Law Enforcement (NSCR), Amsterdam, the Netherlands

4. Centre of Expertise Cyber Security, The Hague University of Applied Sciences (THUAS), The Hague, the Netherlands; Netherlands Institute for the Study of Crime and Law Enforcement (NSCR), Amsterdam, the Netherlands

Abstract

People tend to disclose personal identifiable information (PII) that could be used by cybercriminals against them. Often, persuasion techniques are used by cybercriminals to trick people to disclose PII. This research investigates whether people can be made less susceptible to persuasion by reciprocation (i.e., making people feel obligated to return a favour) and authority, particularly in regard to whether information security knowledge and positive affect moderate the relation between susceptibility to persuasion and disclosing PII. Data are used from a population-based survey experiment that measured the actual disclosure of PII in an experimental setting ( N = 2426). The results demonstrate a persuasion–disclosure link, indicating that people disclose more PII when persuaded by reciprocation, but not by authority. Knowledge of information security was also found to relate to disclosure. People disclosed less PII when they possessed more knowledge of information security. Positive affect was not related to the disclosure of PII. And contrary to expectations, no moderating effects were found of information security knowledge nor positive affect on the persuasion–disclosure link. Possible explanations are discussed, as well as limitations and future research directions.

Publisher

SAGE Publications

Subject

Law

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3