Standardized Reporting on the Preoperative CT Assessment of Potential Living Renal Transplant Donors: Can We Create a Universal Report Standard to Meet the Needs of Transplant Urologists?

Author:

Benhabib Hadas1ORCID,Crivellaro Priscila Sacilotto2ORCID,Osman Heba3,Gunaseelan Senthujan4,Chung Andrew5ORCID,Lee Jason Y.6,Colak Errol1,Leung Vincent5,O’Sullivan Joseph2,Walsh Cynthia2,Kielar Ania1

Affiliation:

1. Department of Medical Imaging, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada

2. Department of Medical Imaging, London Health Sciences Centre, University Hospital, Western University, London, ON, Canada

3. Department of Radiology, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, ON, Canada

4. Department of Radiology, Health Sciences Centre (HSC – 3N26), McMaster University, Hamilton, ON, Canada

5. Department of Diagnostic Radiology, Kingston Health Sciences Centre, Kingston General Hospital, Queen’s University, Kingston, ON, Canada

6. Division of Urology, University Health Network, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada

Abstract

Purpose: Determine whether standardized template reporting for the preoperative assessment of potential living renal transplant donors improves the comprehensiveness of radiology reports to meet the needs of urologists performing renal transplants. Methods: Urologist and radiologist stakeholders from renal transplant centres in our province ratified a standardized reporting template for evaluation of potential renal donors. Three centres (A, B, and C) were designated “intervention” groups. Centre D was the control group, given employment of a site-specific standardized template prior to study commencement. Up to 100 consecutive CT scan reports per centre, pre- and post-implementation of standardized reporting, were evaluated for reporting specific outcome measures. Results: At baseline, all intervention groups demonstrated poor reporting of urologist-desired outcome measures. Centre A discussed 5/13 variables (38%), Centre B discussed 6/13 variables (46%), and Centre C only discussed 1/13 variables (8%) with ≥90% reliability. The control group exhibited consistent reporting, with 11/13 variables (85%) reported at ≥90% reliability. All institutions in the intervention group exhibited excellent compliance to structured reporting post-template implementation (Centres A = 95%, B = 100%, and C = 77%, respectively). Additionally, all intervention centres demonstrated a significant improvement in the comprehensiveness of reports post-template implementation, with statistically significant increases in the reporting of all variables under-reported at baseline ( P > .01). Conclusion: Standardized templates across our province for CT scans of potential renal donors promote completeness of reports. Radiologists can reliably provide our surgical colleagues with needed preoperative anatomy and incidental findings, helping to determine suitable transplant donors and reduce potential complications associated with organ retrieval.

Publisher

SAGE Publications

Subject

Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and imaging,General Medicine

Cited by 2 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

1. Retrospective analysis of radiological investigation of surgically excised head and neck lipomas;European Archives of Oto-Rhino-Laryngology;2024-05-13

2. Editor’s Corner: November 2023;Canadian Association of Radiologists Journal;2023-05-09

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3