Assessment of Radiology Artificial Intelligence Software: A Validation and Evaluation Framework

Author:

Tanguay William12ORCID,Acar Philippe12,Fine Benjamin34,Abdolell Mohamed5,Gong Bo6,Cadrin-Chênevert Alexandre7,Chartrand-Lefebvre Carl12,Chalaoui Jean12,Gorgos Andrei12,Chin Anne Shu-Lei12,Prénovault Julie12,Guilbert François12,Létourneau-Guillon Laurent12,Chong Jaron8,Tang An12

Affiliation:

1. Centre hospitalier de l’Université de Montréal, Montréal, QC, Canada

2. Department of Radiology, Radiation Oncology and Nuclear Medicine, Université de Montréal, Montréal, QC, Canada

3. Department of Diagnostic Imaging, Trillium Health Partners, Mississauga, ON, Canada

4. Department of Medical Imaging, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada

5. Department of Radiology, Dalhousie University, Halifax, NS, Canada

6. Department of Radiology, Vancouver General Hospital, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada

7. Department of Medical Imaging, CISSS Lanaudière, Université Laval, Joliette, QC, Canada

8. Department of Medical Imaging, Western University, London, ON, Canada

Abstract

Artificial intelligence (AI) software in radiology is becoming increasingly prevalent and performance is improving rapidly with new applications for given use cases being developed continuously, oftentimes with development and validation occurring in parallel. Several guidelines have provided reporting standards for publications of AI-based research in medicine and radiology. Yet, there is an unmet need for recommendations on the assessment of AI software before adoption and after commercialization. As the radiology AI ecosystem continues to grow and mature, a formalization of system assessment and evaluation is paramount to ensure patient safety, relevance and support to clinical workflows, and optimal allocation of limited AI development and validation resources before broader implementation into clinical practice. To fulfil these needs, we provide a glossary for AI software types, use cases and roles within the clinical workflow; list healthcare needs, key performance indicators and required information about software prior to assessment; and lay out examples of software performance metrics per software category. This conceptual framework is intended to streamline communication with the AI software industry and provide healthcare decision makers and radiologists with tools to assess the potential use of these software. The proposed software evaluation framework lays the foundation for a radiologist-led prospective validation network of radiology AI software. Learning Points: The rapid expansion of AI applications in radiology requires standardization of AI software specification, classification, and evaluation. The Canadian Association of Radiologists' AI Tech & Apps Working Group Proposes an AI Specification document format and supports the implementation of a clinical expert evaluation process for Radiology AI software.

Funder

Fonds de recherche du Québec — Santé

Publisher

SAGE Publications

Subject

Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and imaging,General Medicine

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3